Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Problem with working on PIFA design in CST

Status
Not open for further replies.

Aliza

Newbie level 3
Joined
Jul 15, 2008
Messages
3
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
1,305
Hi everyone,

I am currently working on PIFA deisng in CST. I have tried many deisng from KIN-WONG book and followed many papers for CST design. Recently i design BRANCH LINE PIFA. Although am getting resonant frequencies 1 GHz and 1.8 GHz but the error am getting with it is"Steady state criterian hasnt been met, maximum number of pulse widths simulated Solver stopped".
Can anybody tell me why is that?

Also has anybody really worked on PIFA design on CST and got the simulations correctly .
If yes could you please give the dimensions and other things?

Thank you
 

Re: PIFA design

Use a lower value for energy criteria for simulation conclusion. Sounds like you have energy that is still trapped in your model that has not yet dissipated or radiated. Are you sure you are using absorbing boundaries? It might be that your simulation workspace is closed becuase of incorrect boundary conditions and the energy is getting trapped inside the workspace.

--Max
 

Re: PIFA design

yeah that cud be the reason...I am using open boundary conditions. This pifa design is for GSM 900/1800 MHz. Although i am getting the resonant frequencies at 900 and 1800 MHz but with little bandwidth. I am using CST , so in boundary conditions it gives options either with open add space or open. Do you any idea wt could be the Mesh cells size?? I will try different boundary conditions.
 

Re: PIFA design

It would be better if you upload your file.
 

Re: PIFA design

Aliza said:
yeah that cud be the reason...I am using open boundary conditions. This pifa design is for GSM 900/1800 MHz. Although i am getting the resonant frequencies at 900 and 1800 MHz but with little bandwidth. I am using CST , so in boundary conditions it gives options either with open add space or open. Do you any idea wt could be the Mesh cells size?? I will try different boundary conditions.

I think it's better to use "Open--Add Space". That way, it's less likely that you might have absorbing boundaries too close to your model, where they might absorb the field lines in a non-physical manner.

If you have 2-3 cells through the thickness of your dielectric, you should be OK. You might want to place a mesh control definition on the dielectric body to enforce this.

--Max
 

PIFA design

Hi,
Try to increase the number of simulated pulse widths. You will find it in the Transient Solver dialog box under "Specials".

P.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top