Oct 15, 2005 #1 T Thommer Junior Member level 1 Joined Apr 12, 2005 Messages 18 Helped 0 Reputation 0 Reaction score 0 Trophy points 1,281 Activity points 1,437 Hello! Please help me to type the following 2 expressions into matlab! Thank you Thommer
Oct 31, 2005 #2 A a_shawky Junior Member level 2 Joined Mar 19, 2005 Messages 21 Helped 1 Reputation 2 Reaction score 0 Trophy points 1,281 Location egypt Activity points 1,488 dear frind , instead of trying to write the sigma (i cant remember that it exisits) do a for loop on the addition between two variables (the new one , and the summation of all the previous) if that helped you please press on the Helped me button
dear frind , instead of trying to write the sigma (i cant remember that it exisits) do a for loop on the addition between two variables (the new one , and the summation of all the previous) if that helped you please press on the Helped me button
Oct 31, 2005 #3 B b.pricope Junior Member level 2 Joined Oct 27, 2005 Messages 21 Helped 2 Reputation 4 Reaction score 0 Trophy points 1,281 Activity points 1,487 The 2 sums are just convolution of 2 signals. You can use the matlab conv function. Read help for this. If you need to implement the convolution yourself tell me and I will provide you a .m file with it! If it helped you: click helped me, please!
The 2 sums are just convolution of 2 signals. You can use the matlab conv function. Read help for this. If you need to implement the convolution yourself tell me and I will provide you a .m file with it! If it helped you: click helped me, please!
Nov 6, 2005 #4 A anto2 Member level 3 Joined Dec 1, 2003 Messages 56 Helped 1 Reputation 2 Reaction score 0 Trophy points 1,286 Activity points 531 use the cumsum command, and remember think in terms of vectors.
Nov 6, 2005 #5 T Thommer Junior Member level 1 Joined Apr 12, 2005 Messages 18 Helped 0 Reputation 0 Reaction score 0 Trophy points 1,281 Activity points 1,437 Thanks for your help, but I solved the problem I used matrix - vector form and then easily made the convolution instead of dealing with loops Thommer
Thanks for your help, but I solved the problem I used matrix - vector form and then easily made the convolution instead of dealing with loops Thommer