Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

PIFA (Planar Inverted F Antenna)

Status
Not open for further replies.

rvargo

Newbie level 6
Joined
Jan 13, 2009
Messages
11
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
1,377
planar inverted f antenna

Hi,

With a PIFA, you can either use a planar inverted F structure (the 3-dimensional structure), or you can implement using PCB traces. Are there pro's and con's to both structures? Or do they both have similar performance?

To me it seems like the PCB trace would be the ideal solution. It's just a PCB trace, so it essentially costs nothing. The planar version seems more complex. Does the planar version offer better performance (better radiation patterns, more efficiency, etc.)?

Thanks.
 

pifa - planar inverted-f antenna vs ifa

Actually the names are different. One is PIFA (Planar Inverted F Antenna), and the other is IFA.
Compare to IFA, PIFA has less radiation through the direction of the ground plane (which is an advantage in mobile phones, reducing SAR), and also has slightly higher gain in both vertical and horizontal polarization (another advantage for mobile phones).
 

    rvargo

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
pifa direction

Thanks for the response. For me, I like the simplicity of a PCB trace. I'd also like to have as omni-directional of a pattern as possible. Are there any big negatives with using an IFA?

Also, how far does an IFA need to be from other components on a PCB? (my concerns being the components distorting the antenna performance, and also the antenna inducing noise on the components)
 

inverted f antenna

For IFA if the ground length provided below the active element is approximately λ/4, the omni-directionality of the antenna is fine for most of the applications.

If the ground-plane is longer than λ/4 the pattern become multi-lobed, and if the ground is much smaller than λ/4 the tuning become critical.

To don’t affect the IFA performances the components shall be placed at a distance from the active element, greater than the distance between active element and ground.
 

Re: PIFA's

If the ground-plane is longer than λ/4 the pattern become multi-lobed

I was planning on putting the IFA on my main PCB, which would have a wavelength much greater than λ/4. According to this statement, this would give me a multi-lobed pattern, which I would not want. Are there any ways I can avoide this? Can I somehow isolate the antenna ground plane from my main ground plane (split the planes)?
 

Re: PIFA's

To make smaller ground plane always is easier than make greater.
Do some cuttings, but simulate or measure in the same time the antenna pattern.
 

    rvargo

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top