neoaspilet11
Full Member level 5
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2005
- Messages
- 277
- Helped
- 29
- Reputation
- 56
- Reaction score
- 8
- Trophy points
- 1,298
- Location
- Cebu, Philippines
- Activity points
- 4,048
Mr.Cool said:just curious to what type of reponse i would get if i were to ask:
"from where does the electron get its energy such that it can poor out electomagnetic fields CONTINUOUSLY for the entire life of said electron?"
think before you post, its not an easy answer.
Mr.Cool
you were correct about everything except "there is no radiation". it is still radiating, there is just nothing near bye to interract with it. when a tree falls in the forest does it make a sound? of course... it is the laws of physics that determins if a sound is made - not the presence of a human.if it is a isolated electron in its own universe with nothing else (i am saying the electron will not interact with anything else), then the electron already posess the E-field. there is no radiation. it is a static field. there is no power flowing.
if you are talking about creating a electron, then you input the energy to create the field.
It is not a correct argument. first, the electron already posess the field. if we do a integral for the energy stored in the infinite space, we will have a finite value which is all the E-field energy that one electron posses.
so the electron does not pour out energy or absorb energy after it is created.
we need both E-field and M-field to define a power flowing or called Pointine Vector
Mr.Cool said:hehee.. when a tree falls in a forest, does it make a sound?
Mr.Cool
Mr.Cool said:when two magnets are placed near each other, they do not need to be in motion to feel the repulsion effect.
so, i would answer YES they do exert a force on each other.
...
but here we are getting away from the original question. how is the electron in symmetry with its environment if it appears to be totally one sided (gives off efield never absorbs????).
Mr.Cool
Mr.Cool said:you are entirely correct about electric fields. they are not properly defined (yet) in common text books. actually, if you read the "definition" you find that the electric field defines itself.. which of course is wrong.
...
Mr.Cool
Mr.Cool said:aryajur, a novel try. again, i have to disagree if only on the premise that there is NEVER a case when there is no other charge to interact with. even in vacuum there are trillions of charges in the smallest of volumn of space. how does an electron avoid this? it can't.
Mr.Cool
Mr.Cool said:...
Basil, there is great mystery!! even your own statement "a field is a property in spaced caused by something" umm.. that is the point of this thread. what is the source of the field?
Mr.Cool said:cause & effect. in your next statement, "a charge causes an electrical field" they are one and the same. again, i point the analogy of looking up a word in the dictionary and finding the definision is the same word! doesn't make any sense.
xaris106 said:my opinion(and others`):
an electron alone in the vaccum does not "posesses" or "creates" an electric/magnetic field.this is because it has nothing to interact with.if you want to measure its field you must interact with it.so if its alone it does not loose energy in that matter.
....
I don`t know if that solves things,or makes it worse but maybe we can redifine the question to:
why, if i`m an electron (or any charged particle), i go berserk sending photons when i see one of my kind?why there are fundamental forces?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?