Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Nonlinear circuit Stability

Status
Not open for further replies.

aware_boy

Junior Member level 2
Joined
May 7, 2002
Messages
22
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
98
Hi all,

Is anyone know how to study the stability of a circuit which is in the nonlinear state? Like multiplier, or LNA with bias feed back or loop.

Thanks for your help.
 

I am afraid, the abovementioned link will not help.
Just one possible method to proofe stability of a nonlinear system comes into my mind: Procedure of "harmonic balance".
This method works quite well for control systems which have a loop gain exhibiting a low pass overall characteristic which sufficiently attenuates the 2nd harmonic.
 

LvW said:
This method works quite well for control systems which have a loop gain exhibiting a low pass overall characteristic which sufficiently attenuates the 2nd harmonic.
I don't think so.

(1) Both nonlinear stability analysis of Agilent GoldenGate and PSTB analysis of Cadence Spectre are based on a small signal analysis around dynamic operation points determined by large signal steady state analysis such as HB analysis or Shooting Newton analysis.
So 2nd harmonic effects are included in stability analysis since it affects operation point.

(2) In RF amplifier we can't specify clear single feed back loop.
So we don't use Loop Gain for stability study in RF amplifier.
For example see https://www.designers-guide.org/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1218635777/0#5

(3) We have to insert probe for measuring "Loop Gain" in PSTB analysis in Cadence Spectre. We use "Loop Gain" in PSTB of Cadence Spectre.
On the other hand, we don't have to insert probe in nonlinear stablity
analysis in Agilent GoldenGate. Here we don't use "Loop Gain". We use "Eigene Values".

Of course, this nonlinear stability analysis is not perfect.
For example, K-factor evaluation based on nonlinear small small signal analysis such as PSS/PSP of Cadence Spectre is often useless.


https://www.designers-guide.org/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1234428781
https://www.designers-guide.org/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1243078889
 
  • Like
Reactions: rd1303

    rd1303

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
pancho_hideboo said:
LvW said:
This method works quite well for control systems which have a loop gain exhibiting a low pass overall characteristic which sufficiently attenuates the 2nd harmonic.

I don't think so.

Pancho_hideboo: Please, can you explain a little ? (I have the feeling, you mix two different things, which have similar names). The harmonic balance principle is a classical and proven method (described in many books on control theory) to check if a non-linear system tends to a limit cycle (oscillation) or not.
 

LvW said:
I have the feeling, you mix two different things, which have similar names.
I don't mix up.
You can't understand "HB Analysis" correctly.

Can you correctly understand "Periodically Steady State Large Signal Analysis" such as "Harmonic Balalnce" or "Shooting Newton" in RF simulator ?

Maybe you mean "Equivalent Transfer Function Method" or "Describing Function Method" in control system theory.

This is not called as "HB analysis" in RF community.
This is called as "State Averaged Model Analysis" or "Equivalent Lowpass Model Analysis" in RF community.

Slave small signal analysis based on master large signal analysis is different from your "HB analysis" although it will be coincident to my HB analysis if I decrease accuracy or HB order.

Do you have RF theory background ?
 

Maybe you mean "Equivalent Transfer Function Method" or "Describing Function Method" in control system theory.

Hello pancho_hideboo,

You are right - my answer was directed towards the HB method based on describing functions.
But - why are you so sensitive and touchy? My only intention was to answer a question concerning "the stability of a circuit which is in the nonlinear state?".
This was a very general question - and I have tried an answer, that`s all.
Regards
LvW

Just now, I have discovered that you have supplemented your former answer.
Your first answer was only: "I don`t think so" - without any explanation. This gave reason to a misunderstanding. (By the way: From the beginning I didn't realize that the question was asked in the RF part of the forum).
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top