Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

My pcb layout, any suggestion?

Status
Not open for further replies.

zsuhh

Junior Member level 3
Junior Member level 3
Joined
Jan 29, 2014
Messages
28
Helped
3
Reputation
6
Reaction score
3
Trophy points
3
Visit site
Activity points
179
top layer:
top.jpg

bottom layer:
bot.jpg
 
Last edited:

Seems as clearance defined to ground plane is quite small, particularly close to components Pads, which eventually could have a solder drop spreading beyond their unmasked region.




+++
 

Hi,

Thermals are switched off. This makes soldering by hand difficult.

Klaus
 

1\Shape thermal relief orthogonally connects to SMT pins, through pins, that would be best;
2\Shape clearance in the range of 0.3~0.5MM is perfect;
3\you can use thick lines, big vias. to save costs
 
  • Like
Reactions: zsuhh

    zsuhh

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
The clearance is 6 mil between lines and shapes. For soldering, it is no problem. I have soldered a lot this kind of boards by hand.
 

The clearance is 6 mil between lines and shapes. For soldering, it is no problem. I have soldered a lot this kind of boards by hand.

Thermals are the gaps to the signal plane connections. You don't use it. Be sure this is what you want.

Klaus
 
  • Like
Reactions: zsuhh

    zsuhh

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Hi guys, thank you so much.

I have changed the design as folllows;
(1) Thermal relief connect setting: Thru pins: Diagonal; Smd pins : Orthogonal; Vias: Full contact;
(2) I have checked the BBB design. It's clearance between lines and shape is 5mil. So I might keep mine as 6mil.
(3) The line's and visa's size already match the pcb factory's minimal requirement. If I increase them, it still not save money. Anyway, still thank rube so much for your valuable suggestion.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top