Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

[Moved]: Latch with DAC for offset correction

Status
Not open for further replies.

sys_eng

Full Member level 4
Joined
Aug 3, 2016
Messages
193
Helped
0
Reputation
2
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
18
Activity points
1,489
latch_dac.jpg

1)I fail to see how does that 2 current sources become DAC for offset correction.
Anyone has any idea on this?


Here's the text for this latch
When clk is low, the latch resets and its outputs are pulled high. When clk rises,
node S is switched low, and the inputs are amplified onto nodes bM and bP, causing one
to fall more rapidly. The cross-coupled inverters then regeneratively amplify to full swing.
The current-mode DAC is connected to internal nodes of the latch, so it has no effect on
the input capacitance, and only slightly slows the regeneration of the latch.
 

I think you've got it backwards, the purported DACs
apply a correction current apiece to the inputs. The
outcome is what's symbolized as a current source.

Now why you'd want to embed two DACs per latch
cell kind of eludes me.

Maybe there's only one pair per bit line (pair) and the
improvement in speed / sensitivity / reliability is worth
the pain. But I kind of doubt it. Bit line capacitance
is liable to dwarf the capacitance of the input device
and so you could probably just use bigger, better
matching transistors and come out better off than
doing it by complexity.

I suppose the calibration scheme is also "left as an
exercise...".

I suspect maybe this is all patent driven, like they had
to make a sense amp that wasn't already lawyered up
and this let them get a patent. Make it a 1-bit DAC,
always "0" current code, and you've busted somebody
else's patent grip for a trivial implementation cost.

Or something.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top