Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

momentum via setup in inductor&transformer simulation

Status
Not open for further replies.

rfkevin

Newbie level 4
Joined
Jul 6, 2009
Messages
7
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
1,337
I got a problem when I use momentum to simulate inductor/transformer. My inductor spiral is at M6 and is connected to underpass at M5 through via5 in D5. So, my substrate setup is like this

------Strip m6 (thickness expansion down)
D5 [VIA] via5
------Strip m5

When I check the structure in 3D view, I found via5 starts from top surface of m5 to the top surface of m6. However, via5 is assumed inserted between top surface of m5 and the bottom surface of m6. I guess it is because "thickness expansion down" option of m6, which expand the dielectric layer with the same thickness of m6 and with the same permittivity of D5.

Does anyone have experience to solve this problem? Thanks.
 

Re: momentum via setup in inductor&transformer simulatio

I've aksed Agilent supporting engineer. He confirmed my set-up is correct and this "error" is result by Momentum. In fact, Momentum is 2-D simulator. So, when we use thickness expansion of metal trace, such "error" will happen. Anyway, the Momentum simulation results are close to those by Sonnet. Here is 3-D structure of the transformer I simulated. As shown in the picture, via8 (grey) is overlaid with M9 (green). But, actually, via8 should only reach to the bottom of M9.


 

Re: momentum via setup in inductor&transformer simulatio

Sorry to make you confused. M5, M6 and via5 listed in the first post are M8, M9 and via8 shown in 3-D structure. Thanks.
 

Re: momentum via setup in inductor&transformer simulatio

Thanks for reply, kspalla. M9 has to be set "thickness expasion down" coz its dielectric constant (the dielectric between M9) is same with that between M8 and M9 but different with it above M9.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top