Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

LVDS -common mode disturbances

Status
Not open for further replies.

avt

Member level 5
Joined
Apr 25, 2005
Messages
86
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
1,981
lvds common mode voltage

Hi,

LVDS driver and receiver pose both high-impedance nodes to common-mode signals which cuople into the differential line (on the TX there are current sources - on RX MOSFET gates) - so my question is - how are the common mode sdisturbances "damped"/"rejected" - the reflection factors are in no way as good as for the the differential signal (which see at least on the receiver side a differential termination resistor).

So what happens to common-mode disturbances in LVDS-signaling ?
 

guorui

Newbie level 4
Joined
Aug 14, 2007
Messages
5
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
1,301
lvds common mode

I think common-mode disturbances have small effect on LVDS-signaling
 

avt

Member level 5
Joined
Apr 25, 2005
Messages
86
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
1,981
voltage disturbance

well, yes that's true - because the receiver only detects differential signals.

But : - if you have common-mode- signals that will see reflection factors of > 99% on each side - the common-mode-signal will add up quite "a bit" when these reflection interfer at the ends - so a disturbance of 20 (to 40 dB) below the signal can quickly add up to a disturbance that might reach the borders of common-mode at the receiver side imo (under worst case conditions).

- furtheron if the single-ended finite resistors at the ends of the line are to a certain degree unbalanced - than this will generate a differential signal - and if you have a cmfb-amplifier this might be the case for certain (high) frequencies quite extensively (maybe there might be some fixing for that by design of the cmfb - let me know how to do that ;)) - at least when I do the test in Figure 3-10 in the IEEE standard I will get quite annoying results with a cmfb-approach - so let me know ...
 

Grig

Full Member level 4
Joined
Sep 3, 2004
Messages
222
Helped
36
Reputation
72
Reaction score
12
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
1,469
common mode termination lvds

Hello
You have no ideal simmetry on PCB and IC package
So diff mode will couple to common mode and vs
If cm reflection is large You will have resonace due to cm on diff mode transfer function
 

fanrourou

Junior Member level 3
Joined
Dec 12, 2007
Messages
30
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
1,468
lvds common volt requirements

You should check the common-mode feedback circuit , I think .
 

Yayray

Newbie level 3
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
4
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
1,301
100 ohm differential line common mode impedance

Hi,
the common mode noise is most of the time responsible for emc problems. That means high frequency common mode noise is radiated.

One way of damping the common mode only would be to use a bad conductor as the ground. The differential signal traces would still see the good metal, but the common mode which is guided by the ground(s) will be damped.

Best is however to keep the noise small.
 

Grig

Full Member level 4
Joined
Sep 3, 2004
Messages
222
Helped
36
Reputation
72
Reaction score
12
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
1,469
lvds common

This is why LVDS spec includes cm retutn loss
 

ankumar

Newbie level 6
Joined
Jan 13, 2008
Messages
11
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
1,339
impedance measurement conclusion

If you have a common mode not connected to good 1.2V of ref-supply, you will get good response.

Added after 1 minutes:

sorry, I meant to say "common mode node" instead of "common mode note"
 

rfsystem

Advanced Member level 3
Joined
Feb 25, 2002
Messages
914
Helped
148
Reputation
292
Reaction score
38
Trophy points
1,308
Location
Germany
Activity points
9,548
common mode noise in lvds

As I remember LVDS use different impedances to have power consumptation options but did not specify either common mode or differential impedance.

What me surprises is that a obvious good manual

https://www.national.com/appinfo/lvds/files/National_LVDS_Owners_Manual_4th_Edition_2008.pdf

show on page 9 a possible wrong driver reference schematic. The MOS on the lower side switch to ground or a specific signal. The electric difference is that with two lines and two states there are 4 impedances.

Is the LVDS source impedance:

1. <<100 Ohm Common Mode
2. >>100 Ohm Differential Mode

?

or High Impedance (Current Source) for logical high
and Low Impedance (Voltage Source) for logical low

On the other side if the receiver does not have any common-mode termination small differences in the transmitter source currents lead to high common-mode voltage disturbances. I f I assume a spec for the cmd-balance of the transmitter and there is an unspecfied receive-side cmd-impedance the cmd-voltage could go anywhere.

So conclusion will be that there "must" be a low ohmic common-mode transmit impedance. And the receive side "must" be high impedance. Otherwise a special feature, ground bounce, from the chips will not be rejected efficient. Summarize the total picture:

Transmitt:

Zdif>>100Ohm
Zcmd<<100Ohm

Receive:

Zdif=100Ohm
Zcmd>>100Ohm
 

FvM

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 22, 2008
Messages
48,515
Helped
14,271
Reputation
28,805
Reaction score
12,974
Trophy points
1,393
Location
Bochum, Germany
Activity points
280,590
common mode termination what is it

Hello,

you shouldn't overvalue such "principle" schematics as from the said National document. I would rather regard datasheet specifications as solid facts, although some properties are still left open. From the datasheets, it's clear, that common mode voltage is within narrow bounds arround 1.2V. Thus your conclusions regarding common mode impedance must be basically correct.

Differential receiver impedance is out of doubt, but differential transmitter impedance seems to be almost unspecified. Surely it isn't forbidden to have it at 100 Ohms, but it may be also above or below to my opinion. I noticed, that all manufacturer apparently are avoiding a specification with their LVDS related products. To my opinion, it won't get you anywhere trying to interpret non-information.

It may be interesting to measure empirical impedance properties of LVDS interfaces, but I didn't feel yet a need to.

Regards,
Frank
 

rfsystem

Advanced Member level 3
Joined
Feb 25, 2002
Messages
914
Helped
148
Reputation
292
Reaction score
38
Trophy points
1,308
Location
Germany
Activity points
9,548
is differential reflection common or differential

To came back to the original question. The receive side impedance is clear. So coupled common-mode signals traveling to the receiver are not absorbed. But on transmit side the coupled signal should be arriving at an ideal matched output to the common-mode impedance of the lines.

Passing some hours from the last post I remember a reference schematic with switched resistors. The resistors where also calibrated by selecting a subset of them. Would came closer to the 100 Ohm diff impedance and little higher cmd impedance.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Top