Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Layout of NMOS-transistors in series

Status
Not open for further replies.

hannover90

Member level 4
Member level 4
Joined
Dec 8, 2009
Messages
70
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Location
Germany
Visit site
Activity points
1,784
Hi all,

i do layout of 3 NMOS transistors (in 65 nm technology, tsmc), which are connected in series.
The bulk of each transistor should be connected to the source of the according transistor.

How can I isolate each transistor?

Is it right, if I use Deep-Nmos transistors, which are enclosed by a NWell-rings?

Thanks for any help,

hannover90
 

yes you can use deep nwell transistors, connect the 5th terminal to VDD that will reverse bias the junction and there would be no such leakage as well. :)
 
Hi all,

i do layout of 3 NMOS transistors (in 65 nm technology, tsmc), which are connected in series.
The bulk of each transistor should be connected to the source of the according transistor.

How can I isolate each transistor?

Is it right, if I use Deep-Nmos transistors, which are enclosed by a NWell-rings?

Thanks for any help,

hannover90

Yes, you're right..
In order to isolate 3 transistors with bulk connected to corresponding sources, you've to enclose each transistor with NWell guardring.. Only by doing that, you can able to seperate the 4th terminal (bulk)..
You'll get LVS error only by doing above thing,..
You've to draw an psub2 layer over the NWell (bulk) to avoid stamp error while runnig LVS.. --> for this thing, you no need to enclose it by NWell ring..
I think psub2 layer is available in tsmc..
 
Last edited:
Yes, you're right..
In order to isolate 3 transistors with bulk connected to corresponding sources, you've to enclose each transistor with NWell guardring.. Only by doing that, you can able to seperate the 4th terminal (bulk)..
You'll get LVS error only by doing above thing,..
You've to draw an psub2 layer over the NWell (bulk) to avoid stamp error while runnig LVS.. --> for this thing, you no need to enclose it by NWell ring..
I think psub2 layer is available in tsmc..

Thanks for your reply. Psub2 is helpful for LVS (computer), but it can not be used on the chip. There is no Psub2 in praxis.
 

Psub2 is helpful for LVS (computer), but it can not be used on the chip. There is no Psub2 in praxis.

Of course there's a P+ tap in the P-Well of an isolated NMOS transistor, but it's usually connected to the source of the NMOS, see this image:
isolated_NMOS_and_PMOS_cross_section.png
 
Thanks for your reply. Psub2 is helpful for LVS (computer), but it can not be used on the chip. There is no Psub2 in praxis.

Yes, I agree that psub2 layer is a virtual layer..
I'll explain it in some 2 conditions,

1.
Different Grounds--> ex, vssd & vssa :
You'll have different grounds only in your block levels as vssa & vssd.. In that time you'll use psub2 layer to clear your LVS. But In the topmost level (Dphytop or ...) you should connect all your different grounds to one pin ( all substrates'll be connected together ). So there is no need of psub2 layer in future..

2.
In your case ( nmos series conn.. ), you should use psub2 layer to clear LVS..
And there'll be no any problem in future..

I'm not sure with my 2nd point, Please someone make us clear...

Thanks in advance.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top