Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

In CPW waveguide without back grounded plane, which kind of port is better?

Status
Not open for further replies.

skgangwar

Newbie level 2
Newbie level 2
Joined
Feb 23, 2014
Messages
2
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1
Visit site
Activity points
13
I am using a coplanar waveguide (CPW) without back grounded plane, which kind of port is better?

I have tried waveports, but observing asymmetric electric field using HFSS in the perpendicular direction (z) of the CPW board (in x-y plane). Is lumped ports will help me to get symmetric electric field?
 

I assume your port is centered/symmetric and that your board is too. The waveport port needs to touch both of the ground planes. Double check material assignments. I am guessing that you have an integration line between the signal and one of the grounds. Please confirm or correct these assumptions.
 

Thank you for your reply. I have exactly used the waveports as you described. But it has given me asymmetric electric field. My part of question is that..... Do lumped ports help me to get a symmetric electric field?
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top