hspice on X86 CPU use 2GHz floating > 700M UltraSparc , and the same CPU clock winXP OS is faster than win98 /win2kOn 2002-03-28 12:56, golohoyeah wrote:
I have simulated in PC before, and find the
result not so good...
I think SPARC has more accurate result
On 2002-04-01 05:05, andy2000a wrote:
hspice on X86 CPU use 2GHz floating > 700M UltraSparc , and the same CPU clock winXP OS is faster than win98 /win2kOn 2002-03-28 12:56, golohoyeah wrote:
I have simulated in PC before, and find the
result not so good...
I think SPARC has more accurate result
by the way , have anyone use evercad aditspice ?? (it support verilog + spice)
paulc said:Today, i even found that the results on P4 and Athlon are different! Both simulations are on Win 2K and model, netlist, simulation card are the same.
I use HSPICE because of its proved accuracy and good convergence. In fact, I tried HSIM before, it is several times faster than HSPICE, but for some circuit like switching capacitor circuit, the results are obviously wrong.[/quote
hsim will give good results, if the right tolerances are set.
try seting the analog (most sensitive portion in a single matrix)
dont rely on the outo partitioner, that is bad.]
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?