Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

HFSS prolem: results different for wave guiding structure with and without air box

Status
Not open for further replies.

emfemc

Newbie level 1
Joined
Nov 4, 2011
Messages
1
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
1,290
I simulated s parameters of a two-port PEC wave guiding structure. I tried four different cases:

case 1: Wave ports were used. Results OK.

Case 2: I used PEC 'cap' to cover the ports, and used wave ports. Results OK.

Case 3: The whole structure was put into an large air box. I used lump ports. Results NOT OK.

Case 4: The whole structure was put into an large air box. I used PEC 'cap' to cover the port, and used wave port. Results similar to case 3, NOT OK.


It is very strange if compare Case 2 and Case 4. For both cases, the whole structure actually is wrapped by PEC boundary. So in case 4, there is no interaction of the internal field of the structure with the air outside. So the results of Case 4 should be the same as Case 2. But it is not!

Why the results are different when the structure is put into an air box?
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top