risccpu
Junior Member level 2
Could anyone tell me why the list number of not annotated is smaller than the total not annotated number? I use "report_annotated_parasitics -max_nets 100 -list_not_annotated". For example, the report is as following:
1. net1
2. net2
3. net3
4. net4
5. net5
******************************
report: annotated_parasitics
-list_not_annotated
******************************
| | | RC | Not |
Pin type | Total | RC pi | network |Annotated|
--------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
Internal nets | 23649 | 0 | 23639 | 10 |
--------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
Boundary/port nets| 34 | 0 | 34 | 0 |
--------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| 23683 | 0 | 23681 | 10|
So there are only 5 nets showed verbosely, what are the other 5 nets?
Best Regards,
risccpu
1. net1
2. net2
3. net3
4. net4
5. net5
******************************
report: annotated_parasitics
-list_not_annotated
******************************
| | | RC | Not |
Pin type | Total | RC pi | network |Annotated|
--------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
Internal nets | 23649 | 0 | 23639 | 10 |
--------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
Boundary/port nets| 34 | 0 | 34 | 0 |
--------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| 23683 | 0 | 23681 | 10|
So there are only 5 nets showed verbosely, what are the other 5 nets?
Best Regards,
risccpu