Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Finding inductance and core loss for a powered iron torroid inductor in an "2TFC" SMPS

Status
Not open for further replies.
Z

zenerbjt

Guest
Newbie level 1
****************************________________________**************************************
Hi,
Would you agree that the following PFC application note calculates the wrong value for core loss?

PFC Application note:

It concerns the equation for calculating B at the top of page 7.
The values for a,b,c,d,e, and x are wrong?

They should be as at page 72 of this below, or am I missing something?

****************************________________________**************************************
 

FvM

Super Moderator
Staff member
Advanced Member level 7
Joined
Jan 22, 2008
Messages
51,004
Helped
14,634
Reputation
29,544
Reaction score
13,743
Trophy points
1,393
Location
Bochum, Germany
Activity points
291,800
As mentioned before fitting parameters in Magnetics catalogs are often changed between issues. A different parameter set isn't necessarily wrong, as long as it results in a similar loss order of magnitude.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zenerbjt

    Z

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Z

zenerbjt

Guest
Newbie level 1
*************************************----------------------------**************************
Thanks, What is the maximum flux density use-able with "Kool Mu" inductors?

Page 9 of the following Mag-Inc powder core catalog says that “kool mu” material has a saturation flux density of 1 Tesla.
So why does the "Kool Mu" B vs H graph on page 48 only show flux densitys up to 550mT?

Mag-Inc powder core catalog
*************************************----------------------------**************************
 

Easy peasy

Advanced Member level 6
Advanced Member level 6
Joined
Aug 15, 2015
Messages
4,301
Helped
1,348
Reputation
2,696
Reaction score
1,741
Trophy points
1,393
Location
Melbourne
Activity points
23,998
Maximum "useable" flux density depends on: ability of ckt to handle the lowered Ur, the flux ripple at or about that peak flux, temperature, and the cooling available ...
--- Updated ---

1609112113533.png


Notice the saturation B = 1.0 Tesla, you may have read the 550 mW/cc @ 100kHz, 1000 Gauss ( 0.1 Tesla ac peak )
--- Updated ---

1609112323481.png


You can see from the graph, p48 that 1T requires likely more than 1000 A-t / cm - so getting up to high levels of applied H.
--- Updated ---

1609112648214.png


you can see above for Kool mu at H = 1000 Oe = 79600 A-t / m = 796 A-t/cm, the residual permeability is very low for all grades and the thing is tending towards being an air cored magnetic ...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: zenerbjt

    Z

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Z

zenerbjt

Guest
Newbie level 1
Thanks, i see what you mean, from that, i believe we would not want to operate kool mu at much above 100 A.t/cm
 

Easy peasy

Advanced Member level 6
Advanced Member level 6
Joined
Aug 15, 2015
Messages
4,301
Helped
1,348
Reputation
2,696
Reaction score
1,741
Trophy points
1,393
Location
Melbourne
Activity points
23,998
Indeed, the -26 grade has only dropped to ~ 82% at 100 Oe ( = H of 7960, = 796.0 A-t/cm ) wheras grade -60 has dropped to ~ 47%
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Top