Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Do not understand RF biological effects 4W/kg

Status
Not open for further replies.

BiNa2605

Full Member level 3
Joined
Sep 1, 2015
Messages
179
Helped
6
Reputation
12
Reaction score
4
Trophy points
18
Location
VietNam
Activity points
1,357
Hi everybody,

I read the paper and it has the sentence like that but I don't know exactly the meaning:
that the most heat the human body can deal handle without risking permanent damage is approximately 4 W/kg.

I am not sure 4W/kg that is the limitation of the power output of RF reader or if a person weights 60 kg that is the threshold of the output radiation is 4W*60 :bang::bang::bang:
 

chuckey

Advanced Member level 5
Joined
Dec 26, 2010
Messages
4,863
Helped
1,308
Reputation
2,622
Reaction score
1,283
Trophy points
1,393
Location
Southampton and holiday cottage in Wensleydale (UK
Activity points
31,695
I do not recognise 4W/kg as any RF related threshold. Is it not the amount of heat a body can dissipate without raising the bodies internal temperature to a dangerous level?
The RF safety levels are 10mW/cm^2 or 100V/m.
Frank
 

BiNa2605

Full Member level 3
Joined
Sep 1, 2015
Messages
179
Helped
6
Reputation
12
Reaction score
4
Trophy points
18
Location
VietNam
Activity points
1,357
Actually I am not have the equitment to measure the power per centimet, I just consider the power output of RF reated to health.
Do you know the level of output power of RF wave still safe for health? (Power and time for radiation expose).
This is one of paper's quote: "It was determined that the most heat the human body can deal handle without risking permanent damage is approximately 4 W/kg. To put things in perspective, the normal metabolic rate when someone is sleeping is about 1.0 W/kg. It increases to about 2.0 to 2.5 W/kg during moderate exercise. Much of this research was based on exercise levels rather than on actual exposure experiments. This is because exposure to significant levels of RF energy is very similar to the effects of overexertion."
 

FvM

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 22, 2008
Messages
48,930
Helped
14,335
Reputation
28,934
Reaction score
13,083
Trophy points
1,393
Location
Bochum, Germany
Activity points
282,330
W/kg values are used in regulations dealing with specific absorption rate (SAR), e.g. for mobile phones. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Specific_absorption_rate

Just quoting SAR numbers isn't of much use, you need to refer to the specific conditions. High values like 4 W/kg are accepted either for local and/or short time exposure (e.g. caused by mobile phones) or in special situations, e.g. medical tests.
 

chuckey

Advanced Member level 5
Joined
Dec 26, 2010
Messages
4,863
Helped
1,308
Reputation
2,622
Reaction score
1,283
Trophy points
1,393
Location
Southampton and holiday cottage in Wensleydale (UK
Activity points
31,695
If you weigh 80 kg, then the "safe " power would be 320W. Would you look down a wave guide carrying that amount of power, because it would blind you. The 100V/m is used at low/medium/high frequencies where some one has calculated either the heating effect over the whole body because the wavelength is long or the peak RF current that could flow through the heart.
I can only think that the 4W/kg is somehow based on the heating effect of RF current in the head and the heat is being pumped away in the blood and "sweated" out. It seems unrealistic as a mobile device would be unlikely to run this sort of power. Even the brick phones only ran about 5W.
Frank
 

dick_freebird

Advanced Member level 5
Joined
Mar 4, 2008
Messages
7,449
Helped
2,158
Reputation
4,321
Reaction score
2,035
Trophy points
1,393
Location
USA
Activity points
59,622
I wouldn't place a lot of credence in a general number.
Some meat cooks easier than others. Eyeballs for example.
 

BiNa2605

Full Member level 3
Joined
Sep 1, 2015
Messages
179
Helped
6
Reputation
12
Reaction score
4
Trophy points
18
Location
VietNam
Activity points
1,357
@chuckey How do you think about when the RF just focus on 1 place of the body for along time? So I think in that case we cannot calculate by multiple 4W*x(kg). @FvM said right, we should consider the specific absortion rate (SAR), it is more acadamic and accurate.
@dick_freebird I understood what you mean Brain, eyeballs and body organs are really sensitive and be eaiser effected by RF.
 

BiNa2605

Full Member level 3
Joined
Sep 1, 2015
Messages
179
Helped
6
Reputation
12
Reaction score
4
Trophy points
18
Location
VietNam
Activity points
1,357
I hope we can learn more from this report. In my case, I saw that it is helpful.
 

chuckey

Advanced Member level 5
Joined
Dec 26, 2010
Messages
4,863
Helped
1,308
Reputation
2,622
Reaction score
1,283
Trophy points
1,393
Location
Southampton and holiday cottage in Wensleydale (UK
Activity points
31,695
The levels I gave are for continuous exposure, i.e. an aerial engineer. Short term exposure is a gamble as to where the RF power hits the body.
FWIW The Russians have detected changes in biological cells at a power level of 1mW/cm^2. Its like cancer, how long would it take for a biological cellular injury show as an obvious disease or injury.
Frank
 

SunnySkyguy

Advanced Member level 5
Joined
Sep 26, 2007
Messages
6,988
Helped
1,709
Reputation
3,416
Reaction score
1,697
Trophy points
1,413
Location
Richmond Hill, ON, Canada
Activity points
51,565
I am not sure 4W/kg that is the limitation of the power output of RF reader or if a person weights 60 kg that is the threshold of the output radiation is 4W*60 :bang::bang::bang:

These limits are based on averaged whole body RF conductance from heat rise , not near-field RF levels.

I recall leakage from a 100W VHF amp being tuned by an RF tech without the lid on would get bloodshot eyes after a day's work.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Top