Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

difference between 180 nm and 90 nm interms of all aspects

Status
Not open for further replies.

umaram

Newbie level 4
Newbie level 4
Joined
Feb 27, 2015
Messages
6
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1
Visit site
Activity points
37
hi
for a transistor in 90 nm if the L=0.2 micro meter and width is 4 times of length to achieve required transfer characteristics what could be the changes to be made in 180 nm.
 

Are you asking for W/L ratio & channel length of 180 nm transistor so that it has same saturation region profile as 90 nm transistor.
 

Hi,
In my project I am working on IEEE based .topic is ANALOG IMPLEMENTATION OF A SIGMOIDAL FUNCTION USING CMOS IN 90nm TECHNOLOGY
but we are trying to implement in 180 nm cadence.
concept is that they are following is
[PLEASE CHECK ATTACHED PAPER NAMED P1]
current is the input and voltage is output at the same node as shown in paper
and in the graph of sigmoidal function they have current ranging from -6uA to +6uA
Libraries used: gpdk180
Instances used : nmos, pmos, etc.
Pins used : Input,output.
Proper connections are established between instances in the circuit design.


In 180 nm we are trying to these things
Target Specifications:

Cmos technology to be used: 180 nm.
Supply voltage : 1.8 or 2.5v
No. of transistors 6
Testing region for linearity:
Targeted max. variation wrt ideal function. -6 to +6 microamperes.
Max. error of 8% or better.
Testing range for temperature:
Targeted output voltage variation: -55 to 125 degree celcius
Less than 5% from ideal function.
Initial estimation of total area consumed by the circuit in 180nm tech. <15 micrometer square.
 

Attachments

  • p1.pdf
    401.1 KB · Views: 148

I'm not sure if this source follower architecture works well in a 180nm process - this depends very much on the Vsupply/Vth0 ratio and Vth0_n/Vth0_p symmetry. Instead of the simple source follower I'd prefer a real gain stage with appropriate resistive current feedBack, something like this: View attachment sigmoidal.pdf

For simulation I've used 180nm models with symmetric Vth0. Could be different with the gpdk180nm models.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top