Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Register Log in

CST MWS or HFSS for planar structure..

Status
Not open for further replies.
G

GKG

Newbie level 5
Joined
Sep 24, 2010
Messages
8
Helped
2
Reputation
4
Reaction score
2
Trophy points
1,283
Activity points
1,333
from CST MWS and HFSS, which tool is better for full wave simulation of a planar structure ?
 

debating "better" just starts a never ending street fight. I think of this as a "Good, Fast, Cheap" ....... pick any two debate, The "better" software is the one you have and know how to operate.
 

according to my experience HFSS is better in speed than CST MWS when simulating planar structures.
 

per_lube said:
according to my experience HFSS is better in speed than CST MWS when simulating planar structures.
Click to expand...

I agree. I use HFSS and I am getting pretty good results compared to measurements for planar antennas.

I think CST/SEMCAD is better when your structure is electrically large since FDTD (CST,SEMCAD) does not require as much RAM as FEM (HFSS).

Adel
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top