Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

coupled buck topology

iso14000

Newbie level 4
Joined
Apr 5, 2017
Messages
6
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1
Activity points
52
Hi all

I found out, in my compagny archive, such a topoly

does someone know the common name for it?
after that, I'll google the name and probably be able to found out some equations.

The main advantage I could see , is a lower input current ripple compared to a buck 's one.
inductor are coupled

thanks for your interest
 

Attachments

  • buck coupled.jpg
    buck coupled.jpg
    157.6 KB · Views: 23

cupoftea

Advanced Member level 4
Joined
Jun 13, 2021
Messages
1,158
Helped
28
Reputation
56
Reaction score
55
Trophy points
48
Activity points
6,391
Its an interesting one....and by the looks though...this appears (please do lambast me if im wrong) to offer nothing to improve on the related ones, the coupled Cuk and the coupled SEPIC....both of these have an advantageous low side fet drive, and low side switch current sense. Coupled SEPIC can also offer very low input ripple with suitable lower coupling.
Should you wish attached is coupled cuk and sepic sims in ltspice.

It would also be interesting to see if the coupled Buck needs a leakage snubber....AYK, the coupled SEPIC doesnt need this.
 

Attachments

  • CUK and SEPIC.zip
    44.9 KB · Views: 15
Last edited:

iso14000

Newbie level 4
Joined
Apr 5, 2017
Messages
6
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1
Activity points
52
in CCM , basic transfert fonction seems same as "standard" buck one's.
my hypothesis is : when in steady state, voltage across capacitance is equal to Vin as it could be if switch is off for a long time.
 

iso14000

Newbie level 4
Joined
Apr 5, 2017
Messages
6
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1
Activity points
52
well... maybe, by simulation I cannot point out flaws. I'm not very confident with coupled inductor and there "magic"
what I see , is a much lower current ripple seen by the input.
I found this schematic in a project where input filter cannot be build with chemical caps (especially the big one used with a resistor to damp the ringing).
the high side mosfet isn't a pb because duty is around 50% and gate coupling can be done with a cap

attached the little simulation. I hadded a small RC snubber Feel free to make comments, I'm a newbee

regards
:unsure:
 

Attachments

  • buck coupled inductor.rar
    763 bytes · Views: 15

iso14000

Newbie level 4
Joined
Apr 5, 2017
Messages
6
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1
Activity points
52
As I said, I'm not very confidend with coupled unductor, that's why I finally change simulation model from coupled inductor (with K spice factor fixed to 1) to a inline Xformer .
And I don't know why, simulation isn't the same now....
I push two package , first one with coupled inductor, the next one with a xformer

if one of you could be kind enough to spot me the fault...
 

Attachments

  • buck coupled inductor.rar
    1.5 KB · Views: 6
  • buck with xformer.rar
    3 KB · Views: 8

LaTeX Commands Quick-Menu:

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Top