Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Conformal LEC renaming rule

Status
Not open for further replies.

dhivyanandhini

Newbie level 5
Joined
Jan 2, 2010
Messages
10
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Location
INDIA
Activity points
1,343
Hi would like to change

txdata_reg[0] to txdata_reg[3] in golden for unmapped points

my renaming command is not working...
add renaming rule r1 "txdata_reg[0]" "txdata_reg[3]" -Golden -map

may i knw wat changes to be made....

Thank you
 

"add mapped points gold_point revised_point -noinvert"
should work?
 

txdata[3] of revised is already mapped with txdata[3] of golden....

iam comparing 2 netlist

unoptimized one and optimized one....
in optimized the txdata[0] is optimized and removed whereas txdata[0] remains in unoptimized...

is thr any method to map the txdata[0] to txdata[3].....
 

find out the reason why it is optimized in netlist...use that modeling swithc with set flatten model command....this point will go away and you will get clean results
 

hey thanks....
i used flatten model -all_seq_merge option.....
it solved my problem!!!
 

change the value back to the default value or say No
For e.g to the one used above
set flatten model -no_seq_merge (this is default)

Similarly LEC has options for all modelling directives which can be used in your dofile
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top