pancho_hideboo
Advanced Member level 5
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2006
- Messages
- 2,847
- Helped
- 767
- Reputation
- 1,536
- Reaction score
- 733
- Trophy points
- 1,393
- Location
- Real Homeless
- Activity points
- 17,490
No.The total field of an antenna array is determined by the vector summation of the induction fields radiated by the individual antenna elements.
Coupling can be canceled by diagonalization of impedance matrix of array antenna.In practice, the separation (mutual coupling) between antenna elements is a critical characteristic of antenna arrays.
Fields are simple.In addition, your question seems to refer to the near field,
where things get complex (E and H not perpendicular) and depend on the actual antenna type.
Fields are simple.
E is perpendicular to element at surface of element.
No, I have no answer.Seems that you know ALL the answers
No.why "Perfect synchronized local signal between TX and RX"?
TX frequency may fluctuate with time,
just need to ensure TX is stable enough
during sampling through elements 1,2 and 3.
Not beam forming.Your question is not clear. Is this about the far field?
How is your scenario different from school math used to derive antenna array pattern by superposition of individual antenna's complex signals?
See https://www.edaboard.com/showthread...n-of-Frequency-in-Arrival-Direction-DetectionNo.
Elements 1, 2 and 3 are not sampled at same time.
Consider phase of complex baseband signal not RF signal at Receiver.
Not beam forming.
It is not phased array antenna.
Still you can not understand.Understood, but I think it makes sense if you study phase array math, which is derived by superposition of the individual signals.
No.
Elements 1, 2 and 3 are not sampled at same time.
Consider phase of complex baseband signal not RF signal at Receiver.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?