Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

can time period of a periodic function be imaginary

Status
Not open for further replies.

Roshdy

Member level 3
Joined
Nov 23, 2005
Messages
58
Helped
2
Reputation
4
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Location
Egypt
Activity points
1,750
I think the question needs more explanation to be understood
 

elmolla

Full Member level 2
Joined
Jul 14, 2005
Messages
132
Helped
20
Reputation
40
Reaction score
2
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
2,721
Why not? A famous example is the sin(3*sin(t))... Plot it.. It looks cool :
Try it on MATLAB

t=linspace(0,15,100);
x=sin(3.*sin(t));
plot(t,x);
 

neils_arm_strong

Full Member level 5
Joined
Jan 5, 2006
Messages
289
Helped
22
Reputation
44
Reaction score
3
Trophy points
1,298
Location
Bangalore, India
Activity points
3,247
Hi guys,
I m sorry for asking the wrong question.The actual question is can the period of a periodic function be complex.
 

Roshdy

Member level 3
Joined
Nov 23, 2005
Messages
58
Helped
2
Reputation
4
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Location
Egypt
Activity points
1,750
the explanation needed is not for the typo,
how can you imagine the period to be complex, the cmplex notation is an easier notation for the periodic function, the phase is a reresentation for the time differene between the periodic signals, what is the relation you imagine between the phase and the period of the signals you represent.
 

dspman

Member level 2
Joined
Mar 14, 2004
Messages
42
Helped
5
Reputation
10
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
1,288
Location
...
Activity points
336
hi,

some times we can say that the period of the signal is complex!!
when?
for example, In the case you mentioned we can say the period is complex.
but the problem here is that the signal is complex. It means that you have to had both inphase and quadrature part. so if you have both of them you can say that you have a signal with complex period.
ie. in practice, when you have a I&Q demodulator you have the complex signal.

yours.
 

Roshdy

Member level 3
Joined
Nov 23, 2005
Messages
58
Helped
2
Reputation
4
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Location
Egypt
Activity points
1,750
for exp(x)
exp(x+2*pi*j)=exp(x)*exp(2*pi*j),
exp(2*pi*j)=1, then exp(x+2*pi*j)=exp(x) no periodicity at all

if you lost x in your formula, I mean exp(x+2*pi*j*x) then
exp(x+2*pi*j*x)=exp(x)*exp(2*pi*j*x), it is simply a prouduct of two functions, one periodic exp(2*pi*j), the other is real, the product has three cases
1. if x=0, periodic function
2. if x<0, the periodic function is decaying
3. if x>0, the periodic function is increasing
for x increasing the peak of the function is increasing

**************************************
dear all
I cann't believe that the period can be complex, this is up to my understand, any understand may be wrong, please continue discussion, if any other examples please deliver.
 

dspman

Member level 2
Joined
Mar 14, 2004
Messages
42
Helped
5
Reputation
10
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
1,288
Location
...
Activity points
336
hi,

what is your idea about:
sin(i*x)

yours.
 

neils_arm_strong

Full Member level 5
Joined
Jan 5, 2006
Messages
289
Helped
22
Reputation
44
Reaction score
3
Trophy points
1,298
Location
Bangalore, India
Activity points
3,247
Hmm...
Sin(i*x)=Img(exp(i*i*x)=Img(exp(-x))
If x=p+qi,then exp(-x)=exp(-p)*exp(q*i)
Again this is a kind of decaying or exponentially decreasing sinusoidal wave.
 

dspman

Member level 2
Joined
Mar 14, 2004
Messages
42
Helped
5
Reputation
10
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
1,288
Location
...
Activity points
336
hi,

I think this is a miss understanding!
from the mathematical point of view we can say a function is periodic if:
f(x+t)=f(x) for all x s.
in which t is the period.
so if look to the problem using this definition then we can find some functions that have complex period.
but if you look to the problem from physical point of view, then we can not imagine complex period.
so I think it is nessary to talk about the definition of periodicity.
yours.
 

pmonon

Full Member level 3
Joined
Jan 28, 2006
Messages
155
Helped
7
Reputation
14
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
2,243
neils_arm_strong said:
Hmm...
Sin(i*x)=Img(exp(i*i*x)=Img(exp(-x))
If x=p+qi,then exp(-x)=exp(-p)*exp(q*i)
Again this is a kind of decaying or exponentially decreasing sinusoidal wave.


It's right unless x is real, when img(exp(-x))=0 because exp(-x) is real.

I think the answer to the main problem is not strictly no, mathematically, it's certainly possible. But the period in general is defined as a real quantity and if you want to visualize a complex period this should not be just like the real period rather a different way to express some special property of a signal.
 

LouisSheffield

Member level 5
Joined
Feb 19, 2006
Messages
82
Helped
10
Reputation
20
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
2,164
I would have to answer yes - so long as the imaginary component of the complex period is constant. It then represents a constant amplitude:

sin(a+jb)=cosh(b)sin(a)+j(sinh(b)cos(a)), and
cos(a+jb)=cosh(b)cos(a)-j(sinh(b)sin(a))
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Top