Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

[SOLVED] Bus wiring question, fan or no fan, that is the question?

Status
Not open for further replies.

jgk2004

Full Member level 5
Full Member level 5
Joined
Dec 1, 2009
Messages
274
Helped
77
Reputation
154
Reaction score
74
Trophy points
1,308
Location
Munich Germany
Visit site
Activity points
3,520
Hello all,

I am questioning if I should fan or not fan a signal bus which is relatively slow and has to travel a somewhat long distance on chip. See attached. If I mux then fan out, I feel that number of wires is to large. If I just wire all bus lines to each cell then locally select, it should be a better choice. Or is there something wrong with my thinking? What would you do? Is wiring to all and selecting a bad idea?

4405903300_1359634198.png


JGK
 

What would you do? Is wiring to all and selecting a bad idea?

Not at all, at least for a fast bus: gives you better symmetry, on cost of more buffering.
But for a slow bus the 1st method saves a lot of routing and buffers.
 

Hello Erikl,

Let me get this straight. For a fast bus, the second option is better due to better symmetry but at the cost of buffering. While the first option would saving buffering at the cost of routing and be better for slower busing??

Is this correct?

JGK
 

Let me get this straight. For a fast bus, the second option is better due to better symmetry but at the cost of buffering.
Yes, I think so.

While the first option would saving buffering at the cost of routing and be better for slower busing??
It saves buffering, but not at the cost of routing: it needs less routing, I think, because you need to route only the selected signals - if I understand your 1st method correctly. Or do you always need the full bus behind the MUX (as shown)? If so, it doesn't save routing, of course, just saves buffering - at cost of the MUX. And the timing symmetry still could be sustained - so would be appropriate for a fast bus, too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jgk2004

    jgk2004

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top