ngmedaboard
Member level 3
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2010
- Messages
- 60
- Helped
- 7
- Reputation
- 14
- Reaction score
- 4
- Trophy points
- 1,288
- Location
- United States
- Activity points
- 1,831
Never pulled apart the theory on this one to have a good answer, but can anyone speak to the advantages of the buck over inductorless PWM?
I can see the inductor is necessary to trade off voltage for current. For instance you will be able to pull more current at the lower output voltage than your higher input voltage so long as your total power * efficiency isn't greater than your input power. Anything beyond that?
Option 1:
Buck Converter (Most commonly used in DC-DC step down supplies)
-PWM modulated based on feedback
-Uses dI/dt over inductor for energy conversion
Option 2:
PWM Converter (Most commonly used in Motor Control)
-PWM modulated based on feedback
-No inductor just duty cycle and rectification
Buck Converter (Most commonly used in DC-DC step down supplies)
-PWM modulated based on feedback
-Uses dI/dt over inductor for energy conversion
Option 2:
PWM Converter (Most commonly used in Motor Control)
-PWM modulated based on feedback
-No inductor just duty cycle and rectification
I can see the inductor is necessary to trade off voltage for current. For instance you will be able to pull more current at the lower output voltage than your higher input voltage so long as your total power * efficiency isn't greater than your input power. Anything beyond that?