Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Broadband bias circuits

Status
Not open for further replies.

lindaknoll2002

Member level 2
Joined
Jul 12, 2002
Messages
45
Helped
2
Reputation
4
Reaction score
2
Trophy points
1,288
Activity points
277
Hi all,

I need to design a bias circuits which can reject RF from going to the DC supply without cause niticeable insertion loss at the signal line. The operating frequency is from 1 MHz to 3 GHz. Can anyone suggests some idea how this can be done? Thank you.

Linda.
 

Use the maximum coil value which has higher resonance frequency smaller than 3GHz and then a low ESR capacitors parallel starts from few picofarads to few hundred nanofarads.
Small capacitors will act as decoupling caps. for higher frequencies, higher values will function for lower frequencies..
A Bias Tee consists of them..
 

Hi
If you are looking for a choke that works from 1M to all the way upto 3G- then one way I have seen people do that is connecting inductors in series such that each one of them work in separate bands (min impedance). To elaborate, lets say you have three inductors (L1, L2, L3) in series L1 works(Z>500say) at low freq, L2 in the middle of the band and L3 at the highest freq.
Usually a capacitor to ground, is added at the end to decouple. (I suspect it plays some role in compensating for L flatness as well).
Hope it was useful.
 

The previous reply is a common way for your application. Additional measure you should take is to put each stage of the inductors in parallel with a resistor which is necessary to flatten the final S21 response. RF simulation tools should be used for optimization. Be prepared for about half a dB loss. If go beyond 3G, EM simulation is necessary for this kind of structure. You should use more than on decouple cap also.

Good luck
 

Thank you guys or the help. It works perfectly.

Linda.
 

I am wondering why put several inductors in series instead of using one inductor only?
Thanks a lot
 

Hi

To rfsurfer

Why do we need to put a resistor in parallel to an inductor. I have seen it in a datasheet as well.....do not reslly understand?

Could you explain
 

you should pick up a book named--broad amplifier design
you question explained well in the book
many design examples and measurement.
good luck.
 

Hi wjnbry

who has written the book?

regards
 

"Why do we need to put a resistor in parallel to an inductor. I have seen it in a datasheet as well.....do not reslly understand?"


inductances (lumped) have resonances too. So a parallel resistor damps or reduces Q of the resonance formed by inductance and its parasitic capacitances...
 

Hi

Do I understand it correct, when BW=Fo/Q. So we increase the bandwidth by introducing "loss" in the inductor by adding a resistor or what? But dont we increase the Q by adding a parallel resistor instead of placing it in series?

Maybe I get it now......For a parallel circuit Q=Rp/omega*L. So if we add a second resistor in parallel we decrease Rp, which in turn decrese our Q and in the end increase the bandwidth.....right??

Regards
 

tyassin said:
Hi

To rfsurfer

Why do we need to put a resistor in parallel to an inductor. I have seen it in a datasheet as well.....do not reslly understand?

Could you explain

Yes. It's mainly for damping. Overall frequency optimization should be done with EDA tools.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top