Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronic Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Register Log in

AVR Code Vision or IAR ????

Status
Not open for further replies.

rampo

Junior Member level 1
Joined
Nov 3, 2001
Messages
18
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
55
What's the better C compiler for AVR Code Vision or IAR???
Thanks
 

karabas

Junior Member level 2
Joined
May 18, 2001
Messages
20
Helped
1
Reputation
2
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
1,283
Activity points
97
Look through the forum at h**p://www.avrfreaks.net/phorum/list.php?f=3. It was descussed many times.
 

marie65

Super Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2002
Messages
198
Helped
19
Reputation
38
Reaction score
8
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
1,506
Codevision is easy to use and produce good code. The best part it's the code generator for setting various parts of MCU (timers, initerrupts, ADC etc). Also have good support from the producer. Same low cost range is also ImageCraft with almost similar features. There is also GNU C compiler with the advantage to be free.
IAR is 10 times more expensive then Codevison. It's a little more difficult to acomodate with all the stuffy settings but it worth. Produce shorter code then other compilers (don't forget that AVR core have been designed together with the IAR guys).
 

cancel

Full Member level 5
Joined
May 27, 2001
Messages
251
Helped
15
Reputation
30
Reaction score
4
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
1,878
re:iar

hi ...

for advanced project codevision is not a choice. I would choose from iar or gcc. Do not forget iar is c++. You will write small code faster and easier in codevision but as project gets more complex than it gets complicated. In IAR you have to write everything from the scratch or use other sources but the final code forks very fine. You can see it on some complex projects like AVR EIT(embeded internet toolkit) where atmel used IAR for their code. Other complex project like Ethernut or yampp are using GCC.

regards

cancel
 

venz

Full Member level 2
Joined
May 30, 2001
Messages
129
Helped
2
Reputation
4
Reaction score
2
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
795
marie65 said:
IAR is 10 times more expensive then Codevison. It's a little more difficult to acomodate with all the stuffy settings but it worth. Produce shorter code then other compilers (don't forget that AVR core have been designed together with the IAR guys).
Hi marie65,

IAR is actually 20 times more expensive then Codevision depending on what version you are looking for.
- EW for AVR Light Edition EURO 3000,- ex. VAT.
- EW for AVR Base Line(8k limit) EURO 1000,- ex. VAT.
- EW & MakeApp for AVR full suite EURO 3625,- ex. VAT.
- Codevision Light $60 Node-Locked
- Codevision Standard $150 Node-Locked
- Codevision Standard $250 Floating

greetz, venz.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Toggle Sidebar

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Top