Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

article „how to avoid Gibbs ringing artifacts in measurements“ in Signal Integrity Journal

senmeis

Full Member level 3
Full Member level 3
Joined
Nov 26, 2014
Messages
187
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
2,685
Hi,

I’m reading the article „how to avoid Gibbs ringing artifacts in measurements“ in Signal Integrity Journal at https://www.signalintegrityjournal....avoid-gibbs-ringing-artifacts-in-measurements and have a few questions on this topic.

1. Figure 5 and 8: Do they refer to the s-parameters of the interconnect?

2. From other books I acquired the oscilloscope bandwidth shall be at least 3 times of the signal bandwidth. Is this requirement just the one this article insists (1/BW)?

3. What about older analog oscilloscopes? They don’t have a sharp brick wall filter characteristics. Do they also bring Gibbs artifact?

4. In control theory these ripples are considered as the result of a low damping ratio. Does this explanation coincide with this filter theory?
 
No one cares about this topic? I’m only able to view if from the control aspect (because of my limited background), lead lag controller, PID controller, etc.
 
Most oscilloscopes have smooth vertical amplifier frequency characteristic that doesn't involve significant ringing, both old analog and modern digital types. For me the article is discussing a mostly theoretical problem. If we see ringing in oscilloscope measurements it's mostly caused by bad probe connection. Sufficient bandwidth is nevertheless required for reproduction of pulse waveforms.
 
Hi,

oscilloscope bandwidth shall be at least 3 times of the signal bandwidth. Is this requirement just the one this article insists (1/BW)?
I have a 1960-era Tektronix tube scope rated 1 MHz. (And the timebase selector limits to 1µHz.) I've been surprised to see onscreen waveform frequencies 2 or 3 times that. However I don't trust the amplitude readings because I don't expect those waveforms to be traced accurately.
3. What about older analog oscilloscopes? They don’t have a sharp brick wall filter characteristics.
My Tektronix manual instructs how to calibrate sharpness of leading edges by adjusting a potentiometer. As I do so the appearance gets rounder or spike-y. That section has capacitors and an inductor. The manual doesn't mention Gibbs' ringing.
 
Thanks for above info. Let’s focus on Figure 5. This is a test result, not of an oscilloscope but of a TDR device. As far as I understand this measurement tries to express: The signal has a bandwidth of 39 GHz but the S-parameters of the used connector are limited to 40 GHz. That is the reason of this ringing effect (as FvM mentioned due to this poor connector). Do I understand it correctly?
 

LaTeX Commands Quick-Menu:

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top