ifelix
Member level 1
Hi,
I've an interesting question. Could anyone tell me if, when simulating antennas on HFSS, you have obtained Gain values that are reliable if compared with measured ones?
I've done a lot of different models of antennas in HFSS and also the same models with Ie3d. I've obtained similar results in the 2 simulators. But when I've compared this results with anechoic chamber measurements, sometimes I've obtained matched results but sometimes they are absolutely different (even 8 dB of difference).
The model I've used in HFSS I'm sure is right (dimensions of radiation boundary are ok, seeded the mesh densely over all the frequency range of interest). I've simulated GSM dual-band antennas.
Thanks in adv!
I've an interesting question. Could anyone tell me if, when simulating antennas on HFSS, you have obtained Gain values that are reliable if compared with measured ones?
I've done a lot of different models of antennas in HFSS and also the same models with Ie3d. I've obtained similar results in the 2 simulators. But when I've compared this results with anechoic chamber measurements, sometimes I've obtained matched results but sometimes they are absolutely different (even 8 dB of difference).
The model I've used in HFSS I'm sure is right (dimensions of radiation boundary are ok, seeded the mesh densely over all the frequency range of interest). I've simulated GSM dual-band antennas.
Thanks in adv!