Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

antenna design-HFSS or ansoft designer

Status
Not open for further replies.

spide

Member level 3
Joined
Nov 29, 2004
Messages
61
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
412
hi i am abit confuse with ansoft product.My objective is to design microstrip patch antenna, so which one should i used,either the ansoft designer or the HFSS.Hope some can give me some guidance regarding this.
 

burton

Full Member level 3
Joined
Dec 12, 2003
Messages
177
Helped
15
Reputation
30
Reaction score
10
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
1,077
Designer or HFSS can be used to simulate planar antenna.
 

spide

Member level 3
Joined
Nov 29, 2004
Messages
61
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
412
but which one is more accurate.HFSS is much more difficult to draw the geometry compare with designer which is simple but 2D.pls clarify.
 

id_guy

Junior Member level 1
Joined
Jun 3, 2005
Messages
17
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
1,424
Of course,HFSS is more accuracy
 

eckypting

Junior Member level 3
Joined
Sep 2, 2005
Messages
30
Helped
18
Reputation
36
Reaction score
14
Trophy points
1,288
Location
Washington, DC
Activity points
2,264
Both HFSS and Ansoft Designer can be regarded as accurate... Given identical models, both tools should provide identical results within the numerical precision of their respective computation engines. The challenge is in the care taken by the user to ensure that the models are indeed identical.

Nonetheless for planar circuits, Ansoft Designer will generally reach a solution much more quickly than HFSS. At the conclusion of design development using Designer, many users will verify using HFSS if they are fortunate enough to have both tools...
 
  • Like
Reactions: NDUDI

    NDUDI

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating

abhishek

Junior Member level 3
Joined
Jun 18, 2004
Messages
30
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
302
HFSS is a full wave solver and gives resutls that are more accurate than Ansoft antenna designer. Moreover ansoft is suited for planar design and HFSS can be used for a myraid of antenna designs. If you want to simulate quickly rather than accurately use ansoft. If accuracy is your main concern than go for HFSS. However, i think the difference in the accuracy of ansoft and HFSS is minimal and should not matter in most applications.

Regards
Abhishek
 

notch0611

Newbie level 2
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
2
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
18
Ansoft designer can not consider an effect of finite GND
I did not calculate antenna gain accurately including the effect.
 

divan

Full Member level 1
Joined
Mar 1, 2002
Messages
95
Helped
3
Reputation
6
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
806
if want to make simulation with finite ground - just drow in this grond plate in your design. You 'll have correct result with Designer same as with HFSS.
 

televizak

Newbie level 3
Joined
Aug 7, 2005
Messages
4
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
1,333
I think that Designer is sufficiently acurrate and quic software for planar structures.

HFFS is accurrate but calculation is slow .

T.
 

NEMO25

Junior Member level 3
Joined
Oct 24, 2010
Messages
25
Helped
4
Reputation
8
Reaction score
4
Trophy points
1,283
Activity points
1,418
Hi,
If you want to design a simple structure you can trust Ansoft designer.
If you structure is a complex array of patches and if the dimensions of the dielectric and the ground are important you use HFSS. What you can do is to design first your antenna on Ansoft designer and then export the mask (dxf or iges) to HFSS in order to avoid drawing on HFSS.
Another parameter is the metal thickness: indeed you have to know that the metal thickness is not well simulated on Ansoft designer, espacially if the frequency is high (over 40GHz). In that case you have to confirm with HFSS.
Cheers
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Top