sbhalerao
Member level 1
Antenna array help!!!!
Hi to all,
I am a part of a research group that's presently designing a antenna array - The real catch is that we want the size to be as small as possible... WE decided to settle for folded patch antenna (size λ/16) - though this would mean that we get a gain of 0.3 dBm...
The problem now is-- In almost all the thory books on antennas , its mentioned that elements in a antenna array must be separated by λ/2 distance..
Firstly, is it electrical distance or physical distance??? (the patch can be coiled / so these may be different)
In Thomas Milligan (Modern Antenna Design), its stated " Elements if separated by a lesser distance than will block radiation from other elements"...
I think "they do not block" - its just a case of superposition of the fields from the antenna elements - the resultant field is just the superposition of the fields due to individual antennas( which could be represented by dipole....). So if the distance between elements is less, but the elements are appropriately arranged so that fields do not cancel out or something ( no doubt there will be some loss of radiation - but this may be optimised),....
For our application, size is the most important parameter and we are working on 2.4 GHz ... I am going to simulate the above using IE3D and Empire , but I wanted to know if there's some fallacy/glitch in my scheme...
Thanking you all in advance..
Shantanu Bhalerao
Hi to all,
I am a part of a research group that's presently designing a antenna array - The real catch is that we want the size to be as small as possible... WE decided to settle for folded patch antenna (size λ/16) - though this would mean that we get a gain of 0.3 dBm...
The problem now is-- In almost all the thory books on antennas , its mentioned that elements in a antenna array must be separated by λ/2 distance..
Firstly, is it electrical distance or physical distance??? (the patch can be coiled / so these may be different)
In Thomas Milligan (Modern Antenna Design), its stated " Elements if separated by a lesser distance than will block radiation from other elements"...
I think "they do not block" - its just a case of superposition of the fields from the antenna elements - the resultant field is just the superposition of the fields due to individual antennas( which could be represented by dipole....). So if the distance between elements is less, but the elements are appropriately arranged so that fields do not cancel out or something ( no doubt there will be some loss of radiation - but this may be optimised),....
For our application, size is the most important parameter and we are working on 2.4 GHz ... I am going to simulate the above using IE3D and Empire , but I wanted to know if there's some fallacy/glitch in my scheme...
Thanking you all in advance..
Shantanu Bhalerao