Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

About the placement of thermistor and varistor,please help,thanks.

Status
Not open for further replies.

L_jack_xing

Junior Member level 2
Junior Member level 2
Joined
Nov 16, 2013
Messages
24
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1
Visit site
Activity points
186
I am confusing that why so many SMPS manufacturer's application notes recommend placing thermistor after fuse but before varistor.As there is a likelihood that the thermistor would explode in a surge test.Just change the placement of thermistor and varistor can solve the problem simply.If use the recommended circuit(thermistor place before varistor),there must be using higher level thermistor for take the surge test.Please give me a hand to solve my confusion.Thank you very much.
 

NTC Thermistors (Negative Temperature Coefficient) are used to limit the inrush current flowing through the SMPS when it is powered on.
A NTC Thermistor's resistance decreases when it's temperature increases.

At room temperature, the initial resistance of the thermistor absorbs the power of peak inrush current. Due the current load and gradual heating of the thermistor,it's resistance drops. Their power consumption is negligible during continuous operation...
 

I am confusing that why so many SMPS manufacturer's application notes recommend placing thermistor after fuse but before varistor.As there is a likelihood that the thermistor would explode in a surge test.Just change the placement of thermistor and varistor can solve the problem simply.

Is it so? Why do you expect that the energy which can be absorbed safely by the varistor will "explode" the NTC? Did you oberve the problem in your tests? I rather guess that the series connection will result in a certain share of surge energy and probably less total surge energy delivered to the DUT.
 

...there is a likelihood that the thermistor would explode...

What I have noticed in some products which have repaired recently have been the opposite. The Varistors are the ones who explode, but the reason is precisely because they were not properly sized to electrical condition to which they are subjected.



+++
 

NTC Thermistors (Negative Temperature Coefficient) are used to limit the inrush current flowing through the SMPS when it is powered on.
A NTC Thermistor's resistance decreases when it's temperature increases.

At room temperature, the initial resistance of the thermistor absorbs the power of peak inrush current. Due the current load and gradual heating of the thermistor,it's resistance drops. Their power consumption is negligible during continuous operation...


I know what you said.But surge wave destroy the NTC indeed in the surge test.Some can sustain one surge wave and some can sustain more.However,the NTC is certainly damaged by the surge wave .

- - - Updated - - -

Is it so? Why do you expect that the energy which can be absorbed safely by the varistor will "explode" the NTC? Did you oberve the problem in your tests? I rather guess that the series connection will result in a certain share of surge energy and probably less total surge energy delivered to the DUT.[/QUOAS

As the test result show the phenomenon that the NTC was explode.Some sustained a few number of surge.Some can only sustained one!What problems that the series connection can make? Thanks for help.

- - - Updated - - -

As the test result show the phenomenon that the NTC was explode.Some sustained a few number of surge.Some can only sustained one!What problems that the series connection can make? Thanks for help.

- - - Updated - - -

What I have noticed in some products which have repaired recently have been the opposite. The Varistors are the ones who explode, but the reason is precisely because they were not properly sized to electrical condition to which they are subjected.



+++

Really confusing.I am thinking that is it the NTC's problem?I will find some time test it again.Thank you.
 

As the test result show the phenomenon that the NTC was explode.Some sustained a few number of surge.Some can only sustained one!What problems that the series connection can make? Thanks for help.
Thanks for reporting the details. I take it as a fact, at least for the NTC type you have tested.

What I have noticed in some products which have repaired recently have been the opposite. The Varistors are the ones who explode, but the reason is precisely because they were not properly sized to electrical condition to which they are subjected.
This had been my first guess, too. I believe, the VDR and NTC failure are happenning in different situations, both observations can be true.

In surge tests, you have probably a small NTC volume absorbing much of the surge energy due to inhomogenous initial heating and respective conductivity distribution.
 
Thanks for reporting the details. I take it as a fact, at least for the NTC type you have tested.


This had been my first guess, too. I believe, the VDR and NTC failure are happenning in different situations, both observations can be true.

In surge tests, you have probably a small NTC volume absorbing much of the surge energy due to inhomogenous initial heating and respective conductivity distribution.


This is the detail:
surge level:4kV
Fuse:2A,250V
NTC:5D-9
QQ图片20140114213947.jpg
VDR:471KD14
data explain
1.jpg
471KD14's data
2.jpg

I had test a few times.But the NTC exploded everytime.So I exchange the placement of NTC and VDR.It's work,and the circuit work well after 4 angles surge test.
 

Was the NTC actually hot when applying the surge? Did you try the test under max load?

In general I don't think it makes sense to put an ICL like a NTC before a surge protection device. They're generally not meant to withstand surges (which are quite different from normal inrush events).
 
Was the NTC actually hot when applying the surge? Did you try the test under max load?

In general I don't think it makes sense to put an ICL like a NTC before a surge protection device. They're generally not meant to withstand surges (which are quite different from normal inrush events).

I am sorry,what is ICL?
I had no chance to touch the NTC,because it exploded only after a few of surge wave.I think NTC is useless in withstanding surge too,but,a lot of company's application note put the NTC before VDR indeed.Why they do not put NTC after VDR instead?
 

I had no chance to touch the NTC,because it exploded only after a few of surge wave.I think NTC is useless in withstanding surge too,but,a lot of company's application note put the NTC before VDR indeed.Why they do not put NTC after VDR instead?
You should draw your own conclusions. At the end of the day, your design has to pass the tests.

I'm not sure if the "exploding NTC" problem is common to all fabricates or might be a specific problem of the type you are using. As I already mentioned, I can imagine reasons why NTC are specifically sensitive to high power surges (more than VDR). But presently it's just a guess.
 

Inrush current limiter, like a NTC.

The NTC can likely withstand much greater surges when hot, though they're not usually rated for surges in that state.


OK.In a word ,thank you.I will test afterward.

- - - Updated - - -

You should draw your own conclusions. At the end of the day, your design has to pass the tests.

I'm not sure if the "exploding NTC" problem is common to all fabricates or might be a specific problem of the type you are using. As I already mentioned, I can imagine reasons why NTC are specifically sensitive to high power surges (more than VDR). But presently it's just a guess.


I will test later.Thank you.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top