Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

A question about sigma-delta ADC

Status
Not open for further replies.

Alan_Nesta

Member level 5
Joined
Aug 11, 2005
Messages
80
Helped
5
Reputation
10
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
1,708
I've heard some one said the OPs in it should use 2-stage class AB better,
but I am doubt that if the GBW is enough for it?
And I am wondering if 1-stage folded cascode OP is enough for the design?
Thank you!
 

in 2stage they model the OP such that the second pole is far off from the dominant pole that we are introducing due to our design.... using single stage your gain would be very low but bandwidth higher.... it is just a trade off....

since you are talking about GBW why dont you try using a telescopic op.....
 

when low power working, telescopic op ICMR is very low,
so I think folded is better.
 

ok i agree on that..... but what about the power dissipation, GBW, offset voltage etc etc..... actually what are you designing this opamp for.....
 

Need I care offset voltage for fully-differential one-stage folded-cascode OP?
the system offset is zero for presim?right?
I only need care for layout?
 

actually offset can cause change in the system considerably.... especially in the case of high gain systems like opamp you are supposed to take care that it is minimised.....
 

Alan_Nesta said:
I've heard some one said the OPs in it should use 2-stage class AB better,
but I am doubt that if the GBW is enough for it?
And I am wondering if 1-stage folded cascode OP is enough for the design?
Thank you!

The dc gain requirement in SDM design is not strict ,so the one stage telescopic or folded is enough in many cases, and larger bandwidth could be obtained, some power consumption is saved too. But in cascade architecture, the first stage requires more larger gain to surpress the leakage and distortion, in this case, you can use 2-stage, but many designs still use one stage opamp.
 

you just need to do an accurate design for your first integrator for the others you can choose any topology you want as it's not that stringent so as to affect the system's performance.

it does not matter even if you choose a 3 stage , it's just the way you are going to compensate it.

anyway no one can decide the appropriate topology just by seeing only GBW. there are many other constraints right?
 

ok
thanks to all of you very much
I will try use 2-stage op in first integrator and 1-stage op in others
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top