Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

A question about fully-diff folded-cascode with sc-cmfb

Status
Not open for further replies.

Alan_Nesta

Member level 5
Joined
Aug 11, 2005
Messages
80
Helped
5
Reputation
10
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
1,708
3.3v vdd
presim ac and cmfb are both ok
ac gain=75dB
cmfb gain=70dB
dc operation node OK cm-output=1.65v
but when do c-only postsim
gain is still large
ac=73dB
cmfb=65dB
but cm output voltage is 1.5v!
why?
the op is p-input pair single stage
cmfb connect to p-load of the cascode op
 

You do a C-only DC OP simulation and vcm is wrong? That shouldn't be the case. C-only is just adding capacitors to your circuit, so, no DC information. What else is changing from one sim to the other? Try to simplify things and post the differences, there should be something more than just the new Cs.

You can also do instead of C-only a lvs-extracted view and see what you get
 

I've found the reason!
sa sb is large!
I only know the parameter as ad ps pd
what is sa sb?
 

Alan_Nesta said:
I've found the reason!
sa sb is large!
I only know the parameter as ad ps pd
what is sa sb?

sa and sb is a stress effect parameter. It will affect your Id. Transistor 0.18um and below experience this effect. Just google stress effect u will get a detail explanation. I believe u are using BSIM3. If u r using BSIM4, u will 1 more extra parameter for stress which is sd.....
 

You can't decrease sa and sb, they are a physical dimension of the transistor but you can group the devices so that their sa and sb match.
 

Alan_Nesta said:
in layout how to decrease sa sb?

sa and sb in term of phisical meaning is a distance from the edge of active (STI) in x-dir to the poly. This distance has minimum requirement in Design Rule, but if ur current transistor is bigger than minimum, u can always reduce it....

or maybe ur extracted netlist has problem with extracted sa and sb. Cjheck ur extracted netlist (unit and order)
 

sa sb is about 3-5e-6
is it too large for 90nm process?
my presim set the parameter about 5e-7
 

Alan_Nesta said:
sa sb is about 3-5e-6
is it too large for 90nm process?
my presim set the parameter about 5e-7

normal value shud be 5e-7.... check ur layout....
 

how to check?
I mean how to decrease this parameter in layout?
 

I've seen it
but it says sa sb are better when large
really?
my presim shown just inverse
 

Alan_Nesta said:
I've seen it
but it says sa sb are better when large
really?
my presim shown just inverse

What does it mean by "better" here is that, bigger sa and sb will have lesser stress effect. This is different issuea nd story.

For ur issue, u have to makesure that sa and sb in schematic and layout match!
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top