Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronic Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Register Log in

900 mhz antenna - spec / ideas needed

Status
Not open for further replies.

ghb

Advanced Member level 4
Joined
Jul 15, 2002
Messages
116
Helped
19
Reputation
38
Reaction score
13
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
835
antenna 900 mhz vertical dipole

rules

vertical polarization
monopole style pattern
planar 2.5" x 3.5" max
tuning done on same plane as antenna

so far i have not been anywhere near this goal
i have no polarization purity
or monopole pattern for that matter

ive tried several loop styles
with different tuning methods

i realize ground plane size is a severe short coming

i'm looking for a fresh idea
or someone to tell me to give it up

any ideas?

thanx in advance

ghb
 

flatulent

Advanced Member level 5
Joined
Jul 19, 2002
Messages
4,629
Helped
489
Reputation
980
Reaction score
150
Trophy points
1,343
Location
Middle Earth
Activity points
46,689
must there be a ground plane

Are you required to have a ground plane on the other side? Will this antenna be placed against a conducting surface when used?

Here is a type that will work if the answers to the two above questions are no.

Basically, make a vertical dipole with capacitive hat loading. To describe this, imagine a vertical dipole fed in the center running vertically across your area and in the center (left-right) of the area. Then top load the dipole with perpendicular traces at the ends of the vertical dipole. They run equal lengts to the right and left of the ends. Trim the lengths for the driving impedance to be real with no reactive component. Then use an impedance transforming network to bring the real impedance to the value you need.
 

tapa

Super Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2002
Messages
134
Helped
8
Reputation
16
Reaction score
5
Trophy points
1,298
Location
spain
Activity points
1,094
I don't know if it can help you but, there are a patch configuration called "0 Mode" that it's plane, you can control the size with substrate material and has a monolope like pathern. I have uses this some times with realy good results


TaPa
 

ghb

Advanced Member level 4
Joined
Jul 15, 2002
Messages
116
Helped
19
Reputation
38
Reaction score
13
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
835
the unit has to be planar

this '0 mode' patch sounds interesting
do you have any references on that?

or perhaps some simulation files that i may take a look at

thanx

ghb
 

multanova51

Member level 4
Joined
Mar 3, 2002
Messages
73
Helped
4
Reputation
8
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
1,288
Location
Vatican
Activity points
719
Hi

I am using an antenna for 900 MHz : etched dipole on a printed board size about 80mm by 20mm...
It is on FR4 so you have SQRT(epsilon) electr. length reduction.This is not enough for normal resonance though.
Therefore it is loaded in the center by 2 pcs chipcoils in the order of about 27 nH.
It's a bit lossy though and quite sensitive for the loading tolerance and
has about 4 dB less gain as a normal vertical dipole.
Since it is used in a TX only , I make a bit more power to overcome the loss. For a RX or a trcvr , the loss is too much, I not recommend.
:eek:
Rgds
Mike
 

bmn123

Banned
Joined
Nov 23, 2006
Messages
12
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
0
900 mhz antenna

thanks for the info

Added after 13 minutes:

great info .........thanks a lot
 

Azulykit

Advanced Member level 4
Joined
Feb 18, 2007
Messages
1,116
Helped
218
Reputation
434
Reaction score
112
Trophy points
1,343
Location
All over the Map.
Activity points
8,371
Re: 900 mhz antenna

Looking at your requirements the size restriction is severe (too small) and your lack of success with polarization purity is not surprising.

You might try a monopole buried in a block high dielectric material but I would anticipate gain on the order of -5 dBi at best. That is not particularly good news when you consider a dipole is at 2.1 dBi and a monopole is higher at around 5 dBi.

See if you can push back on the size restriction to get more room to build monopole and include a groundplane in your thinking. You may have an enclosure that you can take advantage of as well.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Toggle Sidebar

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Top