seemanta
Member level 4
Hi,
Can we use the 89C52 directly in place of the 87C52?
I mean the code is 100% compatible I know, however are there
any other caveats I may be ignoring?
And still further, it seems that 89S52 is an enhanced In-System Programmable variant
over 89C52. So, I should be able to replace the 87C52 all the way with 89S52, right?
Is my assumption correct?
Please advise.
regards,
Seemanta
Can we use the 89C52 directly in place of the 87C52?
I mean the code is 100% compatible I know, however are there
any other caveats I may be ignoring?
And still further, it seems that 89S52 is an enhanced In-System Programmable variant
over 89C52. So, I should be able to replace the 87C52 all the way with 89S52, right?
Is my assumption correct?
Please advise.
regards,
Seemanta