Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Derive state space model of this circuit

Status
Not open for further replies.

emancole

Newbie level 1
Joined
Nov 27, 2017
Messages
1
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1
Activity points
9
222.PNG

the X matrix is the voltages across the 2 capacitors [2x1], so the A matrix should be [2x2] and B is [2x1].


Using nodal analysis I am getting 3 terms in my equations and I can't figure out how to eliminate vs and vout and replace it with c2.
 

Using nodal analysis I am getting 3 terms in my equations and I can't figure out how to eliminate vs and vout and replace it with c2.

According to the thread title, you're likely mixing two different procedures: The "Space State" matrices are for stability analysis whereas matrices for the "Nodal Analysis" are for transient analysis and uses another completely different approach for obtaining its values, in which case it would be allowed a matrix with 3 or even more columns (eg. Modified Nodal Analysis).

By the way, you did not specify exactly what equations these are. Following the usual nomenclature for the matrices representing the state space of linear electric circuits (A,B,C,D), for matrix A one must take into account only the reactive components, in the case, the 2 capacitors above, and therefore must have dimension 2x2. The matrix representing the input/output voltage ratio, C should be built with unitary dimension (1x1) or rather, a scalar, once there is only 1 input and 1 output in the above circuit.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top