Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Question regarding Miller Capacitance

Status
Not open for further replies.

hdmi

Junior Member level 3
Joined
Feb 1, 2008
Messages
29
Helped
1
Reputation
2
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
1,549


The attached graph is from W. Sansen book, page 189 and I am a bit confused, on one hand, the text in the book seems to suggest that the rule of thumb is that Cc should be smaller than CL, on the other hand, the gm chart seems to indicate that the optimum Cc is about 4x of CL, my question is that what is the primary consideration to determine the Cc value, and what is the major benefit to have gm1=gm6 as the chart suggests?

Also, if Cc can be so optimally calculated from Gm curves, why do we have to make any assumptions to begin with?
 

Primary concern to decide value of Cc is the bandwith and required phase margin. and major benefit of gm1=gm6 is the improved stability. cutthe draw back is reduced bandwith comparatively.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top