Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.
Re: How Self-resonace freq (SRF) effects Lumped ELement filt
I think the lump components can only achieve their idea value far below its SRF, and for example, when discrete capacitor approaches to SRF, the capacitance of it will decrease, and when its frequency is higher than SRF, it should be inductive instead of capactive. So you need to avoid the lump components operates near SRF.
Re: How Self-resonace freq (SRF) effects Lumped ELement filt
I would advise you to design the filter with lump element below it SRF within the operating frequency. The SRF can be assumed as maximum operating frequency for the lump element. At SRF, the capacitor may not behave like a capacitor, and inductor may not behave like a inductor, so naturally that will affect the performance of the filter at that particular frequency.
Re: How Self-resonace freq (SRF) effects Lumped ELement filt
Common "odd" things are "dips" in passband of LPF or HPF when components'SRF are near or within the operating frequency or non-ideal rejection/stopband response response
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
