+ Post New Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Advanced Member level 3
    Points: 4,165, Level: 15

    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    820
    Helped
    1 / 1
    Points
    4,165
    Level
    15

    Simple CMOS Analog Square-Rooting and Squaring Circuits

    For Simple CMOS Analog Square-Rooting and Squaring Circuits , how to derive equations 13 and 16 ?

    •   AltAdvertisement

        
       

  2. #2
    Super Moderator
    Points: 83,954, Level: 70
    Achievements:
    7 years registered
    Awards:
    Most Frequent Poster 3rd Helpful Member

    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    17,074
    Helped
    3857 / 3857
    Points
    83,954
    Level
    70

    Re: Simple CMOS Analog Square-Rooting and Squaring Circuits

    Hi,

    I opened the document, but didnīt go deeper in the formula.. So I canīt give an answer.

    More than 20 years ago I had to design an analog multiplier circuit .. with ready to buy device. I was not allowed to do this digitally.
    But in the very most cases Iīd perfer the digital processing, because they are more precise and more flexible.

    May I ask why you want to do it with an analog circuit?
    To be honest I find it a bit outdated. But donīt get me wrong, I like analog signal processing, but mainly just to feed ADCs with most perfect input signals.
    And yes, I know, analog circuits have their benefits against digital circuits...in some details..

    Klaus
    Please donīt contact me via PM, because there is no time to respond to them. No friend requests. Thank you.



    •   AltAdvertisement

        
       

  3. #3
    Super Moderator
    Points: 54,836, Level: 57

    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
    Posts
    13,360
    Helped
    2654 / 2654
    Points
    54,836
    Level
    57

    Re: Simple CMOS Analog Square-Rooting and Squaring Circuits

    Quote Originally Posted by promach View Post
    how to derive equations 13 and 16 ?
    From Equation 2 on it looks as though a lot of effort goes toward cancelling the effects of threshold voltages and mismatches between the nested transistors. Equation 1 depicts how voltage and current are related by the square root of 2. It becomes the basis for his circuit.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	equation 1.png 
Views:	1 
Size:	5.9 KB 
ID:	158678

    Then although the article is "fundamental", the author seems to assume the reader has advanced knowledge. He puts formulae for k1 & k2 with no explanation about origin or meaning of terms:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	formula k2 un Cox W L2.png 
Views:	0 
Size:	6.2 KB 
ID:	158679

    Equation 13 appears identical to #5. Equation 16 is almost the same. The premise is to operate the transistor close to pinch-off, near the limit of its operation. Response is non-linear, where small differences greatly affect results. Therefore most of the equations take k1 & k2 into account, for sake of accuracy. The reason is because real components have offset voltages and mismatches.
    The op amp is a convenient method to solve these since the reference voltage is adjustable. The current source is adjustable. Gain is adjustable.


    1 members found this post helpful.

    •   AltAdvertisement

        
       

  4. #4
    Advanced Member level 3
    Points: 4,165, Level: 15

    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    820
    Helped
    1 / 1
    Points
    4,165
    Level
    15

    Re: Simple CMOS Analog Square-Rooting and Squaring Circuits

    In Fig 1, Why would the lower transistor Q1 guaranteed to be in triode operating region ?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	nested_transistor_pair.png 
Views:	1 
Size:	9.4 KB 
ID:	158700



  5. #5
    Super Moderator
    Points: 54,836, Level: 57

    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
    Posts
    13,360
    Helped
    2654 / 2654
    Points
    54,836
    Level
    57

    Re: Simple CMOS Analog Square-Rooting and Squaring Circuits

    Quote Originally Posted by promach View Post
    In Fig 1, Why would the lower transistor Q1 guaranteed to be in triode operating region ?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	nested_transistor_pair.png 
Views:	1 
Size:	9.4 KB 
ID:	158700
    Although I'm not certain how to prove that...
    I wouldn't be surprised if it has to do with this cause and effect below.

    1) Voltage at the transistor gates causes both to conduct (as long as V is above a certain threshold level.)

    2) Current through the lower transistor produces a voltage.

    3) This voltage appears at the source terminal of the upper transistor, in effect changing its G-S relationship.

    4) This alters its conductivity which affects current through it.

    5) Current in the upper transistor is identical to that in the lower. The transistors influence one another by the above steps.

    6) Equilibrium state is reached.

    ---------------------------------------

    This simulation of the circuit illustrates. A picture is worth a thousand words.

    A voltage sweep is applied instead of a fixed current source. This reveals behavior at very low current levels (near pinch-off region). Namely the exponential function of Amperes versus Volts.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	mosfets voltage sweep (V-A plots power) (A-V plots root).png 
Views:	1 
Size:	26.6 KB 
ID:	158709

    Can we say the function definitely is square and square root? Or cube and cube root? Some effort might make it possible to bend response so it is mathematically accurate.



    •   AltAdvertisement

        
       

  6. #6
    Super Moderator
    Points: 266,405, Level: 100
    Awards:
    1st Helpful Member

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Bochum, Germany
    Posts
    46,560
    Helped
    14168 / 14168
    Points
    266,405
    Level
    100

    Re: Simple CMOS Analog Square-Rooting and Squaring Circuits

    Why would the lower transistor Q1 guaranteed to be in triode operating region?
    Counter question, do you understand why Q2 is in pinch-off? This should be your starting point.



--[[ ]]--