Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

PDK tt_pre vs tt_post

Status
Not open for further replies.

m3nsh

Newbie
Joined
Mar 17, 2020
Messages
3
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
1
Activity points
69
In PDKs, the devices models come in different flavors: tt, ss, ff, pre, post.. etc.
My question is what is pre and post? If it's pre-layout and post-layout, what difference is there between the two models?

Thanks!
 

For one thing, parasitic extraction will pick up the poly-
metal, metal-silicon capacitances of the core FET which
are already built into the _pre model. This would be an
added penalty on the post-layout extracted simulation
of RF / fast edge performance.

The _post would remove the amount of double-counted
capacitances to get parity with the _pre result (and
hopefully both have reasonable margin to silicon test).
 
  • Like
Reactions: m3nsh

    m3nsh

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Thank you for your reply.

One more thing: If I'm extracting parasitics by EM simulation of the interconnects, in this case it makes sense to use the _pre all the time, right?
 

_pre would contain the intra-FET metal-poly (as part of cgdo,
cgso) and the EM simulation will also grab that onto the nets
involved. So double counted. I'd use the _post any time you
are doing layout-derived netlists.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top