Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Capacitacne tables in UMC 130nm

Status
Not open for further replies.

shlooky

Member level 2
Joined
Nov 15, 2011
Messages
45
Helped
3
Reputation
6
Reaction score
9
Trophy points
1,288
Location
Slovakia
Activity points
1,657
Hi folks,

I am trying to do PnR using UMC 130nm (PDK by Faraday) and Innovus by Cadence. I cannot do non-default routing rules and/or RC extraction be cause I cannot generate proper capTable files for various RC corners.

I am using generateCapTbl command, tech header LEF file and Intercap models provided by the foundry (plain text file containing some cap data), but the tool says I should not use such an old format and should not use such an old capTable. Indeed, the tool crashes whenever I try to route the design using NDR or extract the parasitics using the generated capTbl. the only option for me is to omit the captables in MMMC definitions and route the design with gross inaccuracy and default routing rules.

Has anyone come across this issue? I do not have too much experience with such an old PDK. I worked with 28nm and 16nm with QRC tech files....

Thanks shlooky.
 

Hi folks,

I am trying to do PnR using UMC 130nm (PDK by Faraday) and Innovus by Cadence. I cannot do non-default routing rules and/or RC extraction be cause I cannot generate proper capTable files for various RC corners.

I am using generateCapTbl command, tech header LEF file and Intercap models provided by the foundry (plain text file containing some cap data), but the tool says I should not use such an old format and should not use such an old capTable. Indeed, the tool crashes whenever I try to route the design using NDR or extract the parasitics using the generated capTbl. the only option for me is to omit the captables in MMMC definitions and route the design with gross inaccuracy and default routing rules.

Has anyone come across this issue? I do not have too much experience with such an old PDK. I worked with 28nm and 16nm with QRC tech files....

Thanks shlooky.

try using encounter instead of innovus. 130nm is legacy technology these days.
 

did try both... encounter and innovus, as well... maybe I should try "stone-age" Silicon Ensamble?
another idea is to sort of device my own captables by running RC extraction in Virtuoso (analog IC design environment by Cadence) for various wire width and spacing combinations...
but still, there has to be a way how to get things running without hacking the official PDK
 

did try both... encounter and innovus, as well... maybe I should try "stone-age" Silicon Ensamble?
another idea is to sort of device my own captables by running RC extraction in Virtuoso (analog IC design environment by Cadence) for various wire width and spacing combinations...
but still, there has to be a way how to get things running without hacking the official PDK

I would not recommend trying SE, that is already too old. maybe there is some tool that can generate a QRC file out of a captable? maybe UMC can help you with that
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top