+ Post New Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9

24th February 2020, 22:04 #1
 Join Date
 Sep 2008
 Location
 cambridge
 Posts
 7,240
 Helped
 524 / 524
 Points
 34,841
 Level
 45
Adding an LC post filter can make an SMPS unstable....use RC filter instead?
As per page 32 of the attached….
“Switch Mode power converter compensation made easy “ by Robert Sheehan
….if you design an SMPS, and you compensate its feedback loop such that it is stable with an output capacitance of C1, say, then obviously it is stable.
Now add another capacitance to the output, call it C2…add C2 downstream of C1.
Now suppose that even with C2 added…the converter is still stable with good gain and phase margins..still stable without changing the compensation……
…Now add an inductor downstream of the output divider, and downstream of C1, but upstream of C2……. Now the SMPS could go unstable. (it will go unstable if the L_C2 resonant frequency is less than 3x the SMPS crossover frequency)
This is (to the simple minded like myself), not intuitively obvious…..
But page 32 of the attached confirms it.
..Now suppose we add a low value resistor instead of the inductor. Can you confirm that this will not go unstable?

Advertisement

24th February 2020, 22:15 #2
 Join Date
 Feb 2014
 Posts
 998
 Helped
 349 / 349
 Points
 7,012
 Level
 19
Re: Adding an LC post filter can make an SMPS unstable....use RC filter instead?
Well just follow the guidelines in your app note. Also see this one. They both address the problem.
http://ridleyengineering.com/images/...r%20design.pdf
Obviously the second LC needs to be 'far away' from the first LC cutoff but the important trick is to put most of the C at the output. So it's big L, small C, small L big C. Now you have little more sensitivity to external C than a single stage filter.
The 2 stage filter is a powerful tool, the small L and small C can make a big difference in ripple with little component size. I'm using it on TypeIII compensated buck converters with good results.
1 members found this post helpful.

25th February 2020, 04:53 #3
 Join Date
 Aug 2015
 Location
 Melbourne
 Posts
 2,179
 Helped
 795 / 795
 Points
 13,281
 Level
 27
Re: Adding an LC post filter can make an SMPS unstable....use RC filter instead?
If you load a converter with a less than critically damped LC stage, where the Fo is close to or less than the crossover freq of the converter  then yes you are asking for problems  similarly if you power a large inductor from a DC/DC converter, this L is in parallel with the o/p C and can reduce the effective C seen by the converter  causing osc issues ... esp if you manage to resonate the parallel LC ckt near or just below the crossover freq ...
This is why building damping into a type 3 controller is a good idea ....
1 members found this post helpful.

25th February 2020, 09:06 #4
 Join Date
 Sep 2008
 Location
 cambridge
 Posts
 7,240
 Helped
 524 / 524
 Points
 34,841
 Level
 45
Re: Adding an LC post filter can make an SMPS unstable....use RC filter instead?
Thanks, i am thinking , the straight RC secondstage output filter may offer good enough filtration, and has no problem with any instability like the LC second stage filter.....the problem with LC type is that you never know if the load connected is going to have a big capacitance and take the second stage LC resonance below 3xcrossover.
Also, eg if the load is an inverter, it may actually comprise an L and a C at its input....and this again, as you know, would possibly bring about instability...so if one had added an output RC stage filter (downstream of the output feedback divider), then you at least get some damping of the load's possible LC input stage....and slightly reduce your chance of going unstable.

Advertisement

25th February 2020, 15:36 #5
 Join Date
 Feb 2014
 Posts
 998
 Helped
 349 / 349
 Points
 7,012
 Level
 19
Re: Adding an LC post filter can make an SMPS unstable....use RC filter instead?
I highly doubt you can specify a useful RC filter without excessive losses or a gigantic C.
Second, understand that any phase shift risks stability: a single extra pole and its 90 degree phase shift will also destabilize your system if its gets 'too close' to the first LC.
See the attached where output C is swept by a factor of 5. You can see that the second LC doesn't budge meanwhile the first LC cutoff moves the same amount for both the single and double stage filters.
1 members found this post helpful.

25th February 2020, 21:56 #6
 Join Date
 Sep 2008
 Location
 cambridge
 Posts
 7,240
 Helped
 524 / 524
 Points
 34,841
 Level
 45
Re: Adding an LC post filter can make an SMPS unstable....use RC filter instead?
Second, understand that any phase shift risks stability: a single extra pole and its 90 degree phase shift will also destabilize your system if its gets 'too close' to the first LC.
Also, we are currently doing a 12kW SMPS……the load will be eight brushless DC motors and their inverters……..we don’t know how much capacitance the customer has put at the input to their inverters…..we also don’t know what the resistance of the bus bars/wires will be going to the inverters from our power supply…..As such, we may well get a very significant output RC post filter….and go into instability.
…….I am wondering if there are any techniques for such “unknown loads”?
In fact, I wonder if we should use the Synqor NQ60W60HGX40 module instead of what we are now using. The NQ60W60HGX40 has an internal output filter of 40uF_330nF_13uF . Also, on page 12 of its datasheet it states that there is no upper limit to the amount of external output capacitance that can be added to it….this would appear to make a mockery of the App Note that I posted in the top post of this thread.?
Synqor NQ60W60HGX40 datasheet:
https://www.synqor.com/products/hvnq/nq60w60hgx40

26th February 2020, 03:35 #7
 Join Date
 Aug 2015
 Location
 Melbourne
 Posts
 2,179
 Helped
 795 / 795
 Points
 13,281
 Level
 27
Re: Adding an LC post filter can make an SMPS unstable....use RC filter instead?
any techniques for such “unknown loads”?
1 members found this post helpful.

26th February 2020, 06:55 #8
 Join Date
 Sep 2008
 Location
 cambridge
 Posts
 7,240
 Helped
 524 / 524
 Points
 34,841
 Level
 45
Re: Adding an LC post filter can make an SMPS unstable....use RC filter instead?
Thanks, and by damped C's i take thats C's with "added ESR" (series resistors added)?

Advertisement

29th February 2020, 13:30 #9
 Join Date
 Sep 2008
 Location
 cambridge
 Posts
 7,240
 Helped
 524 / 524
 Points
 34,841
 Level
 45
Re: Adding an LC post filter can make an SMPS unstable....use RC filter instead?
The second paragraph from the bottom of page 7 of the below, basically implies that if an output inductor is placed in the DCDC module output, then the output capacitance can be above the datasheet_specified_maximum, “C(OUT_EXT)” . –Which begs the question, what in that case is the maximum output capacitance allowed?
http://www.vicorpower.com/documents/...allel_DCMs.pdf
This paragraph essentially implies that the C after an L in the DCDC module output, can be as big as one pleases……this goes against common theory?
Do you know what’s going on here?
The maximum output capacitance of the Vicor DCM3623T50M53TC200 DCDC module appears to be limitless?……as long as its precharged if above 2000uF. (otherwise the module want be able start up)
+ Post New Thread
Please login