+ Post New Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9

14th December 2019, 05:55 #1
 Join Date
 Mar 2018
 Posts
 102
 Helped
 0 / 0
 Points
 862
 Level
 6
Analog realization of trignometric function
After a frantic search to realize sine/cosine functions in analog, I came across the patent reference https://patentimages.storage.googlea.../US4164729.pdf. Can anybody explain , how the linear approximation was arrived? (refer page 10)

14th December 2019, 18:36 #2
 Join Date
 Feb 2012
 Location
 L.A. USA Zulu 8
 Posts
 3,696
 Helped
 879 / 879
 Points
 19,237
 Level
 33
Re: Analog realization of trignometric function
Here's a way to approximate the sine function using an analog multiplier (from this paper.).
Zapper
Curmudgeon Elektroniker

Advertisement

15th December 2019, 07:31 #3
 Join Date
 Mar 2018
 Posts
 102
 Helped
 0 / 0
 Points
 862
 Level
 6
Re: Analog realization of trignometric function
Can you please explain the circuit function

15th December 2019, 08:10 #4
 Join Date
 Apr 2011
 Location
 Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
 Posts
 13,060
 Helped
 2603 / 2603
 Points
 53,513
 Level
 56
Re: Analog realization of trignometric function
I have a hunch that patent writers tend to omit certain details about an invention, so as not to 'give away the store'.
The article tells how sines and cosines are derived "by means of an approximation which forms the "heart' of the converter." As far as I can tell it's 'almost' but not totally explained in the diagrams and text.
There is a network of weighted resistors but without values labelled.
It's possible the author discovered a mathematical relationship between sines and radians, resulting in a particular waveform which he could apply to achieve more accurate results. Etc.
And perhaps since then the inventor (or another person) found another method to do the same task, or a simpler method. Etc.

Advertisement

16th December 2019, 10:03 #5
 Join Date
 Apr 2011
 Location
 Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
 Posts
 13,060
 Helped
 2603 / 2603
 Points
 53,513
 Level
 56
Re: Analog realization of trignometric function
Resistor values are listed in the patent article, column 11. One wonders if such precision is needed (example, 8.1523k ohms, 1.9576k ohms).
Anyway these seem to make up the ladder network. Just for speculation I suppose it could shape a ramp wave (linear) into a sinewave. The difference between the two is portrayed below. Resistor values could be determined by calculation and/or experimentation.

19th December 2019, 06:07 #6
 Join Date
 Mar 2018
 Posts
 102
 Helped
 0 / 0
 Points
 862
 Level
 6
Re: Analog realization of trignometric function
Few more searches let me to circuit diagram and equation as shown. I checked this in microcap. While it works perfectly for static digital inputs , but on dynamic inputs from counter, the circuit fails to converge. I think that the feedback system needs to be analyzed properly. Expert opinion would be higly appreciated. In the circuit, R1 is 1000 ohms and R2 is 562 ohms( Also checked with 555 ohms)

19th December 2019, 08:51 #7
 Join Date
 Jan 2008
 Location
 Bochum, Germany
 Posts
 46,034
 Helped
 13998 / 13998
 Points
 263,431
 Level
 100
Re: Analog realization of trignometric function
I don't see how your circuit is related to the given rational approximation function. There must be two variable terms (D/A circuits controlled by the angle argument) and a circuit implementing a quotient. If I understand right, in the original tracking converter, the quotient operation is realized implicitly by comparing a numerator and denominator term and varying the angle argument, that's not feasible for direct implementation of the approximation.

19th December 2019, 10:11 #8
 Join Date
 Mar 2018
 Posts
 102
 Helped
 0 / 0
 Points
 862
 Level
 6
Re: Analog realization of trignometric function
Consider 10 bit DAC. If Ei is set to 1V DC. Then by varying the digital inputs from 01023, Eo varies from from sin(0 to pi/2). By smaller manipulations, it is possible to get the entire sine wave.

Advertisement

19th December 2019, 13:03 #9
Re: Analog realization of trignometric function
Hi Brad,
FWIW from little me: To provide an observation based on a breadboard version of a multiplier/divider circuit using the jellybean part LMC6464 (quad op amp) + 2N2222As + measured (1% and 5%, but measured with ohmmeter before use to get calculated values required) resistors, and your knowing my basic level of ability  the resistors do need to be so precise or the results of the calculation are approximations. It's like a calculator that has no decimal point to calculate 2 ÷ 3, not much use for accurate results...
Hope you're fine and well.
Regards!
1 members found this post helpful.
+ Post New Thread
Please login