Microstrip High- and Low-Impedance Short-Line Sections

1. Microstrip High- and Low-Impedance Short-Line Sections

Expression 4.50 can be obtained by equating the ABCD parameters of the two circuits ?

Could anyone advise ?

Note: Screenshots below are taken from Microstrip Filters for RF Microwave Applications, 2nd Edition      Reply With Quote

•

2. Re: Microstrip High- and Low-Impedance Short-Line Sections Originally Posted by promach Expression 4.50 can be obtained by equating the ABCD parameters of the two circuits ?
Yes.

Compare [ABCD] of the followings.
(1) Transmission Line
(2) PI circuit
(3) T circuit  Reply With Quote

•

3. Re: Microstrip High- and Low-Impedance Short-Line Sections

I am still trying to derive the ABCD matrix for the following circuit configuration.

Any help ?    Reply With Quote

•

4. Re: Microstrip High- and Low-Impedance Short-Line Sections

The derivation process could be found at page 25 of the pdf attachment

Now the question is how to derive expression 4.50 given the above ABCD matrix ?

Microwave_Network_Parameter.pdf  Reply With Quote

5. Re: Microstrip High- and Low-Impedance Short-Line Sections

There is no help since it is too easy.

Can you understand following even a liittle ?

This is very easy than the above, if you can understand the above even a little.  Reply With Quote

•

6. Re: Microstrip High- and Low-Impedance Short-Line Sections

The following is the derivation process for expression 4.50

ABCD matrix for transmission line at Figure 4.7(a) ABCD matrix for π-circuit network at Figure 4.7(b) Comparing the two ABCD matrices above gives :  Applying trigonometry double angle formula :   Reply With Quote

7. Re: Microstrip High- and Low-Impedance Short-Line Sections

There is a typo mistake for ABCD matrix for π-circuit network at Figure 4.7(b)

Please see the correction below: Ok, now to more detailed part:

How to derive expressions (5.3) ?
I suppose that this involves eliminating the assumption : ZC << Z0 << ZL

Note: In the post above, I have derived expression (5.2) for inductor, which is equivalent to expression (4.50)   Reply With Quote

--[[ ]]--