+ Post New Thread
Results 21 to 27 of 27

13th July 2019, 22:45 #21
 Join Date
 Aug 2015
 Location
 Melbourne
 Posts
 1,948
 Helped
 711 / 711
 Points
 11,906
 Level
 26
Re: Iron sheet laminated gapped core inductor variation
but using a very low range of magnetic flux density also makes it vary, as you just saw from the above posts

Advertisement

14th July 2019, 02:33 #22
 Join Date
 Nov 2012
 Posts
 3,245
 Helped
 807 / 807
 Points
 17,775
 Level
 32
Re: Iron sheet laminated gapped core inductor variation
it also goes against the principles of physics relating to magnetic materials.
If the quantity called permeability is a constant, then the BH curve would be a perfect straight line. That it saturates means that the permeability is NOT a constant.
The fact that the hysteresis curve encloses some finite area also says that the permeability is also a complex number.
The graph seen in post #7 is nothing but a derivative of the BH curve. The peak corresponds to the midpoint of the rising part of the BH graph.
Something like the Debye equation for the dipole moments (but much more complex) should apply here but I do not recall the equations.
In the BH curve, there is a small toe (close to zero)  that is important but that disappears in subsequent cycles.
But nowhere it goes against the principles of physics as you claim.
But it can get messy.

14th July 2019, 03:09 #23
 Join Date
 Aug 2015
 Location
 Melbourne
 Posts
 1,948
 Helped
 711 / 711
 Points
 11,906
 Level
 26
Re: Iron sheet laminated gapped core inductor variation
there is no published paper or article that says the slope or behaviour the BH curve at low excitation is any different to the slope/ behaviour at slightly higher excitation  nor can cmitra supply one. Also simple ( accurate ) measurement  bears this out ...
   Updated   
permeability is a complex number simply to add in the effect of losses of the BH loop  losses do not affect intrinsic inductance ... very small BH excursions have the same net average slope ( reactive permeability, i.e. uo x ue ) as slightly larger ones for a gapped inductor  which is what we are describing here ...

Advertisement

14th July 2019, 05:23 #24
 Join Date
 Nov 2012
 Posts
 3,245
 Helped
 807 / 807
 Points
 17,775
 Level
 32
Re: Iron sheet laminated gapped core inductor variation
the slope or behaviour the BH curve at low excitation is any different to the slope/ behaviour at slightly higher excitation  nor can cmitra supply one....
For small excursions of H (i.e., the current in this case), far from the saturation limit, the BH curve can be considered linear and hence the mu should be approximately constant.
The actual current has not been provided. If I use 50mH at 50Hz, the impedance will be around 15 Ohm and the current at 50mv will be few mA at most. That is not sufficient to calculate H but the inductor is rated at 1A.
The question is whether the current excursion at 50mv and 300mv will get the core into the nonlinear region of the BH curve? The author claims more than 10% change. I doubt but I also do not know.
Visually, the hysteresis curve, close to zero, far from saturation looks very linear. In particular with low excitation current.
What is the role of the gap in this case? Qualitatively speaking, it will try to linearize the curve but I do not have the patience to recalculate and verify. The midpoint slope will decrease and the mu graph will become flatter.
Personally I do not like measuring an inductor rated at 1A at a current level of few mA. The measurements should be performed around the rated parameters.
My comment was on the principles of physics you mentioned.
Perhaps we are seeing the infamous Barkenhausen effect.

14th July 2019, 08:58 #25
 Join Date
 Aug 2015
 Location
 Melbourne
 Posts
 1,948
 Helped
 711 / 711
 Points
 11,906
 Level
 26
Re: Iron sheet laminated gapped core inductor variation
Barkhausen noise would not rise to the level needed to seriously interfere with measurement at 50mV, the main issue with 50mV measurement is the likely level of environmental noise, and the unknown measurement apparatus ...

Advertisement

14th July 2019, 15:25 #26
 Join Date
 Dec 2015
 Location
 Madrid, Spain
 Posts
 1,275
 Helped
 314 / 314
 Points
 7,372
 Level
 20
Re: Iron sheet laminated gapped core inductor variation
Figure of post #7 shows that relative permeability varies a lot with applied field strength (proportional to current). Lower field strenght gives lower permeability giving lower flux density.
   Updated   
there is no published paper or article that says the slope or behaviour the BH curve at low excitation is any different to the slope/ behaviour at slightly higher excitation
   Updated   
For small excursions of H (i.e., the current in this case), far from the saturation limit, the BH curve can be considered linear and hence the mu should be approximately constant.
We get the theoretical value of the inductance at high currents (~0.5 A up to 2 A) and a lot of variation in inductance with low currents (few mAs).
   Updated   
and the unknown measurement apparatus

14th July 2019, 22:26 #27
 Join Date
 Aug 2015
 Location
 Melbourne
 Posts
 1,948
 Helped
 711 / 711
 Points
 11,906
 Level
 26
Re: Iron sheet laminated gapped core inductor variation
a random data sheet has no bearing on a gapped choke made using transformer steel, an old measuring device with unknown capacitor degradation  and unknown whether it properly measures phase angles to determine true inductance rather than just total impedance, and still noise issues at 50mV
1 members found this post helpful.
+ Post New Thread
Please login