+ Post New Thread
Results 1 to 13 of 13

6th December 2018, 18:08 #1
 Join Date
 Jan 2012
 Location
 Italy
 Posts
 808
 Helped
 40 / 40
 Points
 4,719
 Level
 16
complementary input folded cascode opam
dear friends
I am designing a folded cascode opam just like in the attached image,
I have question about this circuit, in typical folded cascode opamp we have current source and current mirror, but in this configuration we only have mirrors, one at the top and one at the bottom,
so how the currents at the output stage is summed, if we know that one of the current is comming from the differential tail current, the other one from where??
I am just thinking that the other current is from the floating current transistors but I am not sure, and if it is true the what are the rules for designing this circuit.
let us assume that I will use a differential tail current = 50 uA.
I would appreciate any kind of help
Thank you in advance

6th December 2018, 18:16 #2
 Join Date
 Nov 2013
 Posts
 644
 Helped
 161 / 161
 Points
 4,288
 Level
 15
Re: complementary input folded cascode opam
Image is missing.
"Try SCE to AUX." /John Aaron/

6th December 2018, 20:18 #3
 Join Date
 Jan 2012
 Location
 Italy
 Posts
 808
 Helped
 40 / 40
 Points
 4,719
 Level
 16
Re: complementary input folded cascode opam
Thank you
I forgot the image,, here it is

Advertisment

7th December 2018, 12:02 #4
 Join Date
 Nov 2013
 Posts
 644
 Helped
 161 / 161
 Points
 4,288
 Level
 15
Re: complementary input folded cascode opam
I recommend you a book where the why is exactly explained, I don't remember exactly:
Operational Amplifiers  Theory and Design
Authors: Huijsing, Johan
(https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9789400793002)
But you can create rail2rail in/out version of this amplifier for example with PMOS current mirror at the top, and NMOS current sources at the bottom, sometimes that has other advantage, if I remember well the DC offset of above version is worse, but I am not sure."Try SCE to AUX." /John Aaron/
1 members found this post helpful.

7th December 2018, 13:48 #5
 Join Date
 Jan 2012
 Location
 Italy
 Posts
 808
 Helped
 40 / 40
 Points
 4,719
 Level
 16
Re: complementary input folded cascode opam
thank you fran for your help but this circuit is should i work with and i am not fully understanding it

Advertisment

7th December 2018, 18:10 #6
 Join Date
 Sep 2008
 Location
 Germany
 Posts
 8,077
 Helped
 2648 / 2648
 Points
 51,629
 Level
 55
Re: complementary input folded cascode opam
frankrose is right: "Try SCE to AUX." /John Aaron/. It really worked, then
Your circuit question about the function of this high swing cascode current source was also explained in one of Johan Huijsing's original papers: "LowPower LowVoltage VLSI Operational Amplifier Cells" by Johan H. Huijsing, Ron Hogervorst, and KlaasJan de Langen in IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I: FUNDAMENTAL THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, VOL. 42, NO. 11, NOVEMBER 1995, which you can download freely.
See pp. 848 ff. Fig. 24 & 25, and the text explanation thereof.
1 members found this post helpful.

Advertisment

7th December 2018, 20:05 #7
 Join Date
 Nov 2013
 Posts
 644
 Helped
 161 / 161
 Points
 4,288
 Level
 15
Re: complementary input folded cascode opam
I'm happy you, erikl also like this quote. And good article by the way. Have a good evening! :)
"Try SCE to AUX." /John Aaron/

9th December 2018, 13:46 #8
 Join Date
 Jan 2012
 Location
 Italy
 Posts
 808
 Helped
 40 / 40
 Points
 4,719
 Level
 16
Re: complementary input folded cascode opam
Thank you Erikl for your reply
I am pleased that you still active in this forum, you helped me a lot many years ago when i was doing my thesis
back to the circuit, I took a look on the circuit of Huijsing, it is the same explained by Holberg, you can see that he put current source at the bottom of the output stage and current mirror at the top, this procedure is actually followed by most of the references,
The one I should follow is the one from Jakob which I attached his image,
since there is no current source neither at bottom or the top, does it mean that the output current is set by the floating current sources (from Jakob circuit)
I must use the floating current source because I need to use the output class AB buffer stage
let us suppose that my differential tail current is 50uA to make it reference point for your suggestions
Thank you very much in advance

11th December 2018, 00:03 #9

11th December 2018, 17:19 #10
 Join Date
 Jan 2012
 Location
 Italy
 Posts
 808
 Helped
 40 / 40
 Points
 4,719
 Level
 16
Re: complementary input folded cascode opam
Hello Erikl,
Thank you for your reply
Actually I see that Vbias3 and Vbias4 are not used to source or sink currents, these voltages are used to bias the wide swing mirror for each the top and down,,
even if you come to your circuit you can see that there is current source symbol Iref1 0 30 uA, and M4 transistor output voltage is only to fix the M5 to minimum sat region...
I mean if in your circuit there is a symbol of current source, how the case with the output stage of my circuit.
thank you and sorry to make it long

13th December 2018, 16:49 #11
 Join Date
 Sep 2008
 Location
 Germany
 Posts
 8,077
 Helped
 2648 / 2648
 Points
 51,629
 Level
 55
Re: complementary input folded cascode opam
Hi Junus,
I think there is a misunderstanding: the bias voltages for the wide swing mirrors are Vbias3 and Vbias2, not Vbias4.
This above figure, i.e. the current source + its left MOSFET (M4) as a voltage source was just meant as an example for the generation of the control voltage of a wide swing mirror. You have to consider the base connection between M4 and M5 as the bias voltage for the wide swing mirror, i.e. Vbias3 respectively Vbias2 .
Vpcas and Vncas are the control voltages of the floating current sources  the right one of them controls the quiescent current through the output stage.
1 members found this post helpful.

Advertisment

13th December 2018, 23:18 #12
 Join Date
 Jan 2012
 Location
 Italy
 Posts
 808
 Helped
 40 / 40
 Points
 4,719
 Level
 16
Re: complementary input folded cascode opam
Thank you erikel for your reply
now you came to my point,
yes in these two days i read the article you gave to me, he is saying that this floating current source will set the output stage current,
the only difference now, some of the references says we set the current at the output stage equal to the one of the differential tail current (in my circuit diagram I1=I2=differential tail current),
some of them says to the half of it. and I am confused by it.
I would also ask you please about the slew rate, which formula govern this topology.
still I have couple of doubts but I will discuss about it after clearing this issue

17th December 2018, 22:13 #13
 Join Date
 Sep 2008
 Location
 Germany
 Posts
 8,077
 Helped
 2648 / 2648
 Points
 51,629
 Level
 55
Re: complementary input folded cascode opam
Both indications are not correct: your I1 & I2 source the operation currents for the nchannel input stage, respectively sink the operation currents of the pchannel input stage, that's why they (I1 & I2) must be bigger than these operation currents of the differential input stage, at least by a factor of 2 , better 3 .
The slew rate δVout/δt essentially is given by the max. current of the output stage Imax, and its load capacitance C_{L}: δVout/δt = Imax / C_{L} .
+ Post New Thread
Please login