Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Resistor Sizing makes Width too big for layout

Status
Not open for further replies.

Puppet123

Full Member level 6
Joined
Apr 26, 2017
Messages
356
Helped
22
Reputation
44
Reaction score
21
Trophy points
18
Activity points
3,059
Hello,

I am doing Bipolar layout and need a small resistor, about 3.8 ohms.

In my process this means a 150um width and 1.6u length resistor - which is way too wide for lay out.

What can I do to make the width shorter and make it so I can actually do a lay out without this large width ?

Seems all my resistors in this PDK have large sheet resistances.

Thank you.
 

A little more info would be helpful. Can you provide a pic of your schematic and resistor options?
 

Use a metal layer? From required current density and electrical resistivity you can calculate the required width and length.
 

Depending on the technology you might have options such
as stacking Nem on Nbase on Nsink on NBL to maximally
drive down sheet rho. This might be in the library as a
"crossunder" element (or not - more popular in the days
of single level metal). Such a critter would have more variability
than a single-shot resistor.


Surprising that a Nem or Pem resistor would be high sheet
resistivity, I am used to emitters in the 10-20/sq and base
in the 100-300/sq ranges.


Seems to me that an emitter (N or P) resistor ought to come
in about 1/3 - 1/5 square. Maybe these are not "approved"
in the externally-released PDK but with some negotiation,
could be allowed / quantified / support provided.

Metal is an option, probably 0.1 /sq range so you would be
looking at 20-40 squares and fat enough to carry the current.
Could be that, at low currents, a serpentine could be sensible.

If this is an emitter ballast resistor, consider that each of the
N emitter "fingers" wants its own resistance and the 3.8 ohms
might be the "parallel sum" (like maybe 16, 60 ohm resistors,
one per emitter stripe) and a lot more fortunate local aspect
ratio? See whether the resistor can be made "spatially diffuse"
and maybe non-layout-impacting, or even layout-improving
by (say) using the resistor(s) as crossunders (for example,
emitter current through 16 resistors-as-crossunders, means
room above for the gang base feed routing...).
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top