Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Register Log in

Low pass filter design

Status
Not open for further replies.
C

cane21

Junior Member level 1
Joined
Aug 19, 2018
Messages
15
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1
Activity points
105
Hi

I just need some clarification regarding a LPF design.

I have a signal f(t)= 4 sin(500t)+ sin(15000t) and want to filter out the high frequencies by at least 20dB.

I’m confused about the 20dB, does that just refer to the roll-off rate?

Would a RC or RLC LPF be better in this case?

Thank you.

- - - Updated - - -

I’m also unclear as to how to determine what the cut-off frequency should be.
 

Hi,

No this 20dB is not the roll off rate.

****
The aim is
* to leave "4 sin(500t) " amplitude as is (as good as possible)
* to attenuate "sin(15000t)" amplitude by 20dB

20dB is a factor of 10
20dB attenuation is -20dB which means a factor of 1/10

The quotient of both frequencies is 15000/500 = 30.
Because 30 >> 10 this means a first order filter should be sufficient.
RC is good.

Cutoff frequency needs to be less than 1/10 of the higher frequency.

I recommend to use a simulation tool to play around. Like LTspice.

Klaus
 
  • Like
Reactions: cane21

    C

    cane21

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
I’m also unclear as to how to determine what the cut-off frequency should be.
Click to expand...

1. Roll off are usual slopes (the linear part) of the dB vs log f : they are easy to remember 6 dB /octave or 20 dB /decade. Double them for 2nd order and quad them for a third order filer.

2. The two frequencies are well separated (how do I know?) and hence a first order filter is ok. (you want a 20 dB loss and that means if I use 1000Hz at the corner frequency, 10kHz will be 20dB less)

3. If the upper freq is less than 10kHz, you better use a second order filter. If the two fellows are close by, use a digital filter.

I see KlausST has explained the same solution very succinctly. I also suggest you play with the dB and log f plots and try to work out simple examples by hand (with a calculator).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: cane21

    C

    cane21

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
If a Simple Butterworth Filter will attenuate 20dB@15k Ohmega so the Cut-off frequency will be around 1.5k Ohmega.
Because simple one pole filter 20dB/decade slope.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top