Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Register Log in

[SOLVED] Endcap and Decap Usage in P&R

Status
Not open for further replies.
R

ranaya

Advanced Member level 4
Joined
Jan 22, 2012
Messages
101
Helped
4
Reputation
8
Reaction score
9
Trophy points
1,298
Location
Kelaniya
Activity points
2,164
Hi All,
I want to perform place and route based on UMC 65nm node. However in the design kit, I cannot find above "physical only" cells and instead there are only filler cells (with/without n/p capacitors) and well tap cells. I was wondering whether the Endcaps and Decaps can be replaced by those filler cells with capacitors. Is this possible ?
 

ranaya said:
Hi All,
I want to perform place and route based on UMC 65nm node. However in the design kit, I cannot find above "physical only" cells and instead there are only filler cells (with/without n/p capacitors) and well tap cells. I was wondering whether the Endcaps and Decaps can be replaced by those filler cells with capacitors. Is this possible ?
Click to expand...

there is no difference between a filler cell that serves as a decap or a specific cell that serves as decap. just terminology, same effect.

as to endcap, they have two reasons to exist: make row termination drc clean, and make timing of the cells near the end the same as the ones in the middle. if your process does not require these, you don't need endcaps.
 
Thanks for your quick response.

ThisIsNotSam said:
there is no difference between a filler cell that serves as a decap or a specific cell that serves as decap. just terminology, same effect.
Click to expand...

So at the finishing stage, where the filler cells are added, can all those be filler cells which do have capacitors ? I prefer to use N+P cap fillers as they are smaller, however P cap (only) filler provides very low leakage.

Anuradha
 

ranaya said:
So at the finishing stage, where the filler cells are added, can all those be filler cells which do have capacitors ?
Click to expand...

It is legal, but there are consequences. You may pay the price in leakage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ranaya

    R

    ranaya

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
ThisIsNotSam said:
there is no difference between a filler cell that serves as a decap or a specific cell that serves as decap. just terminology, same effect.

as to endcap, they have two reasons to exist: make row termination drc clean, and make timing of the cells near the end the same as the ones in the middle. if your process does not require these, you don't need endcaps.
Click to expand...

Perfect answer!!!. My comments are below.

Process team/Fab comes with certain requirements of well alignments/well rings on layout boundary, if the designer knows the alignment DRC , he can draw well rings/sometimes metal around the boundary to meet process requirements.

When these cells are placed on boundaries of a partition/sub design,we are ensuring that the integration at higher level will not see any abutment problems.
 

Not needed unless you are not running any calibre DRC checks.
 

Hi ,
For place and route tool tool won’t care physical only cells. The run will go through pnr without any fail.
 

gstekboy said:
Hi ,
For place and route tool tool won’t care physical only cells. The run will go through pnr without any fail.
Click to expand...

That's not good advice. You need the endcaps/tiecells in there as early as possible to make sure you are not messing your floorplan or underestimating the block area.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ranaya

    R

    ranaya

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top