+ Post New Thread
Results 1 to 13 of 13

12th June 2018, 11:18 #1
 Join Date
 Dec 2015
 Location
 Madrid, Spain
 Posts
 1,217
 Helped
 299 / 299
 Points
 6,852
 Level
 19
Cooling SuperSO8 package
Hello everyone,
I am planning to use BSC117N08NS5 which is in a SuperSO8 package.
Max power it will dissipate is 1 W and I want heatsinking via PCB itself (PCB horizontal position). I see that Rth(ja)=50 K/W at 6cm^2 area.
I want to allow Tjunction=100ºC in a 25ºC ambient, so Rth(ja)max allowed is 75 K/W.
My question is, how do I know how the area influences the thermal junctiontoambient resistance ? Is it a linear relationship ? Anyone can provide some docummentation/explanation ?
Thank you for your time !

12th June 2018, 11:43 #2
 Join Date
 Sep 2013
 Posts
 366
 Helped
 143 / 143
 Points
 3,125
 Level
 13
Re: Cooling SuperSO8 package
Your selected device commanded cooling area is 6cm^2 with 75uM copper pad connected to drain. so the heat will transferred to
PCB copper pad and dissipate in to air, if more area more deipation
Referance
http://www.ti.com/lit/an/spra953c/spra953c.pdf
1 members found this post helpful.

12th June 2018, 12:14 #3
 Join Date
 Jan 2008
 Location
 Bochum, Germany
 Posts
 43,155
 Helped
 13131 / 13131
 Points
 248,140
 Level
 100
Re: Cooling SuperSO8 package
The posted formula is applicable for the vertical heat flow through an interface with limited thermal conductivity, e.g. an insulation washer. It does not describe the horizontal heat flow through a copper plane, the topic is beyond the scope of the quoted application note.
Obviously, you have an (inverse) linear relation between copper area and thermal resistance as long as the finite horizontal conductivity can be ignored. Above this range, the thermal resistance is converging against a constant number. You can estimate the overall thermal resistance by a simplified discrete model of concentric rings.
1 members found this post helpful.

Advertisment

12th June 2018, 13:29 #4
 Join Date
 Dec 2015
 Location
 Madrid, Spain
 Posts
 1,217
 Helped
 299 / 299
 Points
 6,852
 Level
 19
Re: Cooling SuperSO8 package
I recognize post #2 formula as the standard conduction thermal resistance for heat flow through that surface.
I believe that is what I need because I did not understand what Infineon was saying with this (page 4, note 1):
"PCB is vertical in still air."
Does that reference the physical position of the PCB ? i.e. PCB is in vertical position ? Or that the flow of heat is vertical through the PCB and hence post #2 formula can be applied ?
Formula #2 can be applied no matter whether the PCB is in vertical or horizontal position. That is why I am wondering why Infineon is saying "PCB is vertical in still air".
Why vertical makes a difference with horizontal ?

Advertisment

12th June 2018, 13:47 #5
 Join Date
 Jan 2008
 Location
 Bochum, Germany
 Posts
 43,155
 Helped
 13131 / 13131
 Points
 248,140
 Level
 100
Re: Cooling SuperSO8 package
I believe that is what I need because I did not understand what Infineon was saying with this (page 4, note 1):
"PCB is vertical in still air."
Vertical configuration is more effective due to hot air ascending and skimming along the surface.
1 members found this post helpful.

Advertisment

12th June 2018, 19:40 #6
Re: Cooling SuperSO8 package
Hi,
Related to the last line of the last post by FvM, have you noticed that routers are vertical these days, no longer horizontal?

12th June 2018, 22:51 #7
 Join Date
 Dec 2015
 Location
 Madrid, Spain
 Posts
 1,217
 Helped
 299 / 299
 Points
 6,852
 Level
 19
Re: Cooling SuperSO8 package
have you noticed that routers are vertical these days, no longer horizontal?

12th June 2018, 22:52 #8
 Join Date
 Jan 2008
 Location
 Bochum, Germany
 Posts
 43,155
 Helped
 13131 / 13131
 Points
 248,140
 Level
 100
Re: Cooling SuperSO8 package
This Wikipedia article gives an idea about the math involved with calculating convection heat transfer https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_t...vertical_plane
1 members found this post helpful.

12th June 2018, 23:22 #9
 Join Date
 Dec 2015
 Location
 Madrid, Spain
 Posts
 1,217
 Helped
 299 / 299
 Points
 6,852
 Level
 19
Re: Cooling SuperSO8 package
Thanks... I was looking for some app notes that directly apply it to this electronic problem, surely a lot of people designed with such a package.
   Updated   
In other words, I was hoping that some app notes already used those formulas (with those coefficients) and obtained accurate results.

12th June 2018, 23:23 #10
 Join Date
 Jan 2008
 Location
 Bochum, Germany
 Posts
 43,155
 Helped
 13131 / 13131
 Points
 248,140
 Level
 100
Re: Cooling SuperSO8 package
There are various examples of copper pour heatsinking for small SMD packages like DPAK in manufacturer datasheets.
Accuracy is relative. As the quoted formulas show, heat transfer coefficient is a function of height and temperature difference. To get the thermal resistance, you also have to put in copper plane thermal conductivity and the geometry.
May be someone knows a link to a calculation tool?

12th June 2018, 23:34 #11
 Join Date
 Dec 2015
 Location
 Madrid, Spain
 Posts
 1,217
 Helped
 299 / 299
 Points
 6,852
 Level
 19
Re: Cooling SuperSO8 package
Speaking of calculation tool, I just found this:
http://www.ti.com/adc/docs/midlevel.tsp?contentId=76735
I hope it is more accurate than their average app notes formulas.
1 members found this post helpful.

Advertisment

13th June 2018, 06:32 #12
 Join Date
 Jan 2008
 Location
 Bochum, Germany
 Posts
 43,155
 Helped
 13131 / 13131
 Points
 248,140
 Level
 100
Re: Cooling SuperSO8 package
Looks good.

13th June 2018, 21:24 #13
 Join Date
 Dec 2015
 Location
 Madrid, Spain
 Posts
 1,217
 Helped
 299 / 299
 Points
 6,852
 Level
 19
Re: Cooling SuperSO8 package
The post #1 transistor (Optimos5 technology) has the same package as the older Optimos3 technology (e.g. BSC057N08NS3G).
In the Optimos3 one, it is specified 62 K/W with minimal footprint area... so, the Optimos5 one must have the same.
+ Post New Thread
Please login